# app_get_status

A read tool on the Eda Agent MCP server.

Agent View of the PolicyLayer registry record for `app_get_status`. HTML page: https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-get-status

## Facts

- Tool: `app_get_status`
- Server: Eda Agent (`salitronic/eda-agent`) — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent.md
- Homepage: https://github.com/salitronic/eda-agent
- Risk category: Read (Low risk)
- Registry record: grade F, identity unverified
- Server rate-limited: no
- Parameters: 0
- Recommended policy verdict: Allowed

## Example call (MCP tools/call, JSON-RPC 2.0)

```json
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "app_get_status",
    "arguments": {}
  }
}
```

## Why app_get_status is rated Low

Based on the naming convention (app_get_*) and context of sibling get operations that retrieve application state and metadata, this tool appears to query current application status without modification. No side effects or destructive operations implied. The empty description lowers confidence slightly, but the 'get_' prefix is a strong signal for Read operations.

From the tool's own definition: "Tool name 'app_get_status' with 'get' prefix and sibling tools like 'app_get_active_document', 'app_get_clipboard', 'app_get_preferences', 'app_get_report', 'app_get_version' all indicate query/retrieval operations."

## Use case

AI agents call app_get_status to retrieve information from Eda Agent without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

## Recommended policy (PolicyLayer)

Verdict: **Allowed**. Enforced by the PolicyLayer MCP gateway (https://policylayer.com/mcp-gateway) before a call reaches Eda Agent:

```json
{
  "version": "1",
  "default": "deny",
  "tools": {
    "app_get_status": {}
  }
}
```

## Other tools on Eda Agent (344)

- `lib_uninstall_library` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/lib-uninstall-library.md
- `obj_batch_delete` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-batch-delete.md
- `obj_delete` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-delete.md
- `pcb_clear_source_footprint_library` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-clear-source-footprint-library.md
- `pcb_delete_design_rule` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-design-rule.md
- `pcb_delete_invalid_objects` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-invalid-objects.md
- `pcb_delete_net` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-net.md
- `pcb_delete_object` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-object.md
- `pcb_remove_layer` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-remove-layer.md
- `pcb_remove_teardrops` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-remove-teardrops.md
- `proj_delete_sheet` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-delete-sheet.md
- `proj_remove_document` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-remove-document.md
- `app_attach` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-attach.md
- `app_run_menu` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-run-menu.md
- `design_execute_plan` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-execute-plan.md
- `design_validate` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-validate.md
- `design_validate_plan` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-validate-plan.md
- `obj_refresh_document` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-refresh-document.md
- `obj_run_process` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-run-process.md
- `obj_switch_view` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-switch-view.md
- `obj_zoom` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-zoom.md
- `pcb_build_from_project` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-build-from-project.md
- `pcb_panelize` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-panelize.md
- `pcb_plan_placement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-plan-placement.md
- `pcb_run_drc` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-run-drc.md
- `pcb_scale` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-scale.md
- `pcb_start_polygon_placement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-start-polygon-placement.md
- `pcb_tune_length` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-tune-length.md
- `proj_compile` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-compile.md
- `proj_force_recompile` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-force-recompile.md
- …and 314 more: https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent.md

## For agents

This record is a snapshot. Live verdicts and the full registry:

- Check every server in your MCP config at once: `npx -y policylayer stack`
- Vet a server before you add it: install the mcp-precheck skill — `npx skills add https://policylayer.com` (skill text: https://policylayer.com/skill.md)
- Query the registry over MCP: endpoint `https://api.policylayer.com/mcp` — tools `check_mcp_server`, `check_mcp_stack`, `check_tool`, `search_registry`, `get_change_events`

---

Source: the PolicyLayer MCP registry — one continuously verified record per MCP server. Full record: https://policylayer.com/registry?q=eda-agent · API: https://policylayer.com/registry/api · Policy library: https://policylayer.com/policies/eda-agent