# audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths

A read tool on the Eda Agent MCP server.

Agent View of the PolicyLayer registry record for `audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths`. HTML page: https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/audit-find-inconsistent-track-widths

## Facts

- Tool: `audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths`
- Server: Eda Agent (`salitronic/eda-agent`) — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent.md
- Homepage: https://github.com/salitronic/eda-agent
- Risk category: Read (Low risk)
- Registry record: grade F, identity unverified
- Server rate-limited: no
- Parameters: 0
- Recommended policy verdict: Allowed

## Example call (MCP tools/call, JSON-RPC 2.0)

```json
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths",
    "arguments": {}
  }
}
```

## Why audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths is rated Low

Despite the empty description reducing confidence slightly, the semantics of 'audit_find_*' pattern across PCB/schematic design tools typically denotes read-only inspection of design attributes (in this case, track widths). There is no indication of data modification, deletion, or external execution. The context of Altium Designer auditing (design review, validation) supports classification as a Read operation.

From the tool's own definition: "Tool name contains 'find' and 'audit', suggesting data retrieval and review operations. The 'audit_' prefix indicates inspection/analysis of design properties rather than modification."

## Use case

AI agents call audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths to retrieve information from Eda Agent without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

## Recommended policy (PolicyLayer)

Verdict: **Allowed**. Enforced by the PolicyLayer MCP gateway (https://policylayer.com/mcp-gateway) before a call reaches Eda Agent:

```json
{
  "version": "1",
  "default": "deny",
  "tools": {
    "audit_find_inconsistent_track_widths": {}
  }
}
```

## Other tools on Eda Agent (344)

- `lib_uninstall_library` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/lib-uninstall-library.md
- `obj_batch_delete` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-batch-delete.md
- `obj_delete` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-delete.md
- `pcb_clear_source_footprint_library` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-clear-source-footprint-library.md
- `pcb_delete_design_rule` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-design-rule.md
- `pcb_delete_invalid_objects` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-invalid-objects.md
- `pcb_delete_net` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-net.md
- `pcb_delete_object` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-object.md
- `pcb_remove_layer` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-remove-layer.md
- `pcb_remove_teardrops` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-remove-teardrops.md
- `proj_delete_sheet` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-delete-sheet.md
- `proj_remove_document` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-remove-document.md
- `app_attach` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-attach.md
- `app_run_menu` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-run-menu.md
- `design_execute_plan` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-execute-plan.md
- `design_validate` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-validate.md
- `design_validate_plan` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-validate-plan.md
- `obj_refresh_document` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-refresh-document.md
- `obj_run_process` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-run-process.md
- `obj_switch_view` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-switch-view.md
- `obj_zoom` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-zoom.md
- `pcb_build_from_project` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-build-from-project.md
- `pcb_panelize` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-panelize.md
- `pcb_plan_placement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-plan-placement.md
- `pcb_run_drc` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-run-drc.md
- `pcb_scale` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-scale.md
- `pcb_start_polygon_placement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-start-polygon-placement.md
- `pcb_tune_length` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-tune-length.md
- `proj_compile` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-compile.md
- `proj_force_recompile` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-force-recompile.md
- …and 314 more: https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent.md

## For agents

This record is a snapshot. Live verdicts and the full registry:

- Check every server in your MCP config at once: `npx -y policylayer stack`
- Vet a server before you add it: install the mcp-precheck skill — `npx skills add https://policylayer.com` (skill text: https://policylayer.com/skill.md)
- Query the registry over MCP: endpoint `https://api.policylayer.com/mcp` — tools `check_mcp_server`, `check_mcp_stack`, `check_tool`, `search_registry`, `get_change_events`

---

Source: the PolicyLayer MCP registry — one continuously verified record per MCP server. Full record: https://policylayer.com/registry?q=eda-agent · API: https://policylayer.com/registry/api · Policy library: https://policylayer.com/policies/eda-agent