# design_audit_schematic

A read tool on the Eda Agent MCP server.

Agent View of the PolicyLayer registry record for `design_audit_schematic`. HTML page: https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-audit-schematic

## Facts

- Tool: `design_audit_schematic`
- Server: Eda Agent (`salitronic/eda-agent`) — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent.md
- Homepage: https://github.com/salitronic/eda-agent
- Risk category: Read (Low risk)
- Registry record: grade F, identity unverified
- Server rate-limited: no
- Parameters: 0
- Recommended policy verdict: Allowed

## Example call (MCP tools/call, JSON-RPC 2.0)

```json
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "design_audit_schematic",
    "arguments": {}
  }
}
```

## Why design_audit_schematic is rated Low

The term 'audit' strongly implies a read/review operation that inspects schematic design data without modifying it. However, the empty description lowers confidence significantly. Given the server context (Altium Designer automation) and the 'audit' naming convention common in EDA tools (which typically means design rule checking or review), this is most likely a Read operation.

From the tool's own definition: "Tool name contains 'audit' and 'schematic', suggesting it reads/analyzes schematic data. Description is empty and uninformative."

## Use case

AI agents call design_audit_schematic to retrieve information from Eda Agent without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

## Recommended policy (PolicyLayer)

Verdict: **Allowed**. Enforced by the PolicyLayer MCP gateway (https://policylayer.com/mcp-gateway) before a call reaches Eda Agent:

```json
{
  "version": "1",
  "default": "deny",
  "tools": {
    "design_audit_schematic": {}
  }
}
```

## Other tools on Eda Agent (344)

- `lib_uninstall_library` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/lib-uninstall-library.md
- `obj_batch_delete` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-batch-delete.md
- `obj_delete` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-delete.md
- `pcb_clear_source_footprint_library` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-clear-source-footprint-library.md
- `pcb_delete_design_rule` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-design-rule.md
- `pcb_delete_invalid_objects` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-invalid-objects.md
- `pcb_delete_net` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-net.md
- `pcb_delete_object` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-delete-object.md
- `pcb_remove_layer` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-remove-layer.md
- `pcb_remove_teardrops` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-remove-teardrops.md
- `proj_delete_sheet` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-delete-sheet.md
- `proj_remove_document` — Destructive — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-remove-document.md
- `app_attach` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-attach.md
- `app_run_menu` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/app-run-menu.md
- `design_execute_plan` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-execute-plan.md
- `design_validate` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-validate.md
- `design_validate_plan` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/design-validate-plan.md
- `obj_refresh_document` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-refresh-document.md
- `obj_run_process` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-run-process.md
- `obj_switch_view` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-switch-view.md
- `obj_zoom` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/obj-zoom.md
- `pcb_build_from_project` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-build-from-project.md
- `pcb_panelize` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-panelize.md
- `pcb_plan_placement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-plan-placement.md
- `pcb_run_drc` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-run-drc.md
- `pcb_scale` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-scale.md
- `pcb_start_polygon_placement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-start-polygon-placement.md
- `pcb_tune_length` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/pcb-tune-length.md
- `proj_compile` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-compile.md
- `proj_force_recompile` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent/proj-force-recompile.md
- …and 314 more: https://policylayer.com/tools/eda-agent.md

## For agents

This record is a snapshot. Live verdicts and the full registry:

- Check every server in your MCP config at once: `npx -y policylayer stack`
- Vet a server before you add it: install the mcp-precheck skill — `npx skills add https://policylayer.com` (skill text: https://policylayer.com/skill.md)
- Query the registry over MCP: endpoint `https://api.policylayer.com/mcp` — tools `check_mcp_server`, `check_mcp_stack`, `check_tool`, `search_registry`, `get_change_events`

---

Source: the PolicyLayer MCP registry — one continuously verified record per MCP server. Full record: https://policylayer.com/registry?q=eda-agent · API: https://policylayer.com/registry/api · Policy library: https://policylayer.com/policies/eda-agent