# dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes

Assess DORA operational resilience by simulating ICT failure scenarios for financial entities. Designed for legal/compliance teams to evaluate ICT risk management under DORA Article 25. Inputs include failure scenario parameters (e.g., ICT service type, duration, impact radius) and entity profile. Outputs structured resilience scores, regulatory gaps, and mitigation recommendations with EUR-Lex/FTC enforcement references.

Agent View of the PolicyLayer registry record for `dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes`. HTML page: https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/dora-operational-resilience-stress-tes

## Facts

- Tool: `dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes`
- Server: Gapup Mcp (`https://mcp.gapup.io/mcp`) — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp.md
- Homepage: https://github.com/getgapup/gapup-mcp-public
- Risk category: Execute (High risk)
- Registry record: grade F, identity unverified
- Server auth posture: open
- Server rate-limited: no
- Parameters: 6 (4 required)
- Recommended policy verdict: Rate-limited

## Parameters

| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `async` | boolean | no | If true, returns a job_id immediately (<200ms) instead of waiting for the result. Poll the result with job_result(job_id). Use for slow tools to avoid client ti |
| `entityType` | string | yes |  |
| `impactRadius` | string | yes |  |
| `ictServiceType` | string | yes |  |
| `existingMitigations` | array | no |  |
| `failureDurationHours` | number | yes |  |

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

## Example call (MCP tools/call, JSON-RPC 2.0)

```json
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes",
    "arguments": {
      "entityType": "<entityType>",
      "impactRadius": "<impactRadius>",
      "ictServiceType": "<ictServiceType>",
      "failureDurationHours": 0
    }
  }
}
```

## Why dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes is rated High

This tool executes simulated ICT failure scenarios against a financial entity's profile to stress-test operational resilience. While it produces reports/scores rather than directly causing system failures, it actively runs simulations with configurable parameters (failure type, duration, impact radius).

From the tool's own definition: "'simulating ICT failure scenarios', 'stress_tes[t]', 'evaluate ICT risk management under DORA Article 25'"

## Use case

AI agents invoke dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes to trigger actions in Gapup Mcp. What it does depends on the arguments the agent supplies, and its effects often reach beyond the immediate call: builds kicked off, notifications sent, workflows started.

## Recommended policy (PolicyLayer)

Verdict: **Rate-limited**. Enforced by the PolicyLayer MCP gateway (https://policylayer.com/mcp-gateway) before a call reaches Gapup Mcp:

```json
{
  "version": "1",
  "default": "deny",
  "tools": {
    "dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes": {
      "limits": [
        {
          "counter": "dora_operational_resilience_stress_tes_rate",
          "window": "minute",
          "max": 10,
          "scope": "grant"
        }
      ]
    }
  }
}
```

## Other tools on Gapup Mcp (270)

- `adversarial_input_stress_tester` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/adversarial-input-stress-tester.md
- `financial_model_3statement` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/financial-model-3statement.md
- `gl_reconciler` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/gl-reconciler.md
- `lgpd_data_subject_rights_automator` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/lgpd-data-subject-rights-automator.md
- `monte_carlo_portfolio` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/monte-carlo-portfolio.md
- `process_mining` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/process-mining.md
- `ugc_moderation_classifier` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/ugc-moderation-classifier.md
- `workflow_orchestrator` — Execute — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/workflow-orchestrator.md
- `abm_architect` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/abm-architect.md
- `account_expansion_mapper` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/account-expansion-mapper.md
- `anti_demissions_hr` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/anti-demissions-hr.md
- `audit_pre_flight` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/audit-pre-flight.md
- `budget_variance_ai` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/budget-variance-ai.md
- `capacity_planning` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/capacity-planning.md
- `capital_strategy` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/capital-strategy.md
- `churn_defender` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/churn-defender.md
- `competitor_moves` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/competitor-moves.md
- `competitor_recommendations` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/competitor-recommendations.md
- `content_engine` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/content-engine.md
- `cross_sell_reco` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/cross-sell-reco.md
- `customer_voice_synth` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/customer-voice-synth.md
- `cyber_risk_auditor` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/cyber-risk-auditor.md
- `deal_structurer` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/deal-structurer.md
- `discovery_prep` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/discovery-prep.md
- `diversity_inclusion_metrics` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/diversity-inclusion-metrics.md
- `earnings_reviewer` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/earnings-reviewer.md
- `enps_auto` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/enps-auto.md
- `event_marketing` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/event-marketing.md
- `fraud_detector` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/fraud-detector.md
- `funding_hunter` — Financial — https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp/funding-hunter.md
- …and 240 more: https://policylayer.com/tools/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp.md

## For agents

This record is a snapshot. Live verdicts and the full registry:

- Check every server in your MCP config at once: `npx -y policylayer stack`
- Vet a server before you add it: install the mcp-precheck skill — `npx skills add https://policylayer.com` (skill text: https://policylayer.com/skill.md)
- Query the registry over MCP: endpoint `https://api.policylayer.com/mcp` — tools `check_mcp_server`, `check_mcp_stack`, `check_tool`, `search_registry`, `get_change_events`

---

Source: the PolicyLayer MCP registry — one continuously verified record per MCP server. Full record: https://policylayer.com/registry?q=io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp · API: https://policylayer.com/registry/api · Policy library: https://policylayer.com/policies/io-github-getgapup-gapup-mcp