Home / Token cost / Agent0

The Agent0 MCP server costs 4,689 tokens before the first call.

Connect Agent0 and its 34 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.3% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Agent0 MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,689 tokens — 2.5× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 34 tools · 4,689 tokens · 2.3% of 200k · 0.5% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.3%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: Agent0 ranks #1063 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,689 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 138 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
search_agents Read 487 10.4%
register_agent Write 314 6.7%
search_feedback Read 290 6.2%
x402_request Read 257 5.5%
give_feedback Read 252 5.4%
configure_wallet Write 178 3.8%
kfdb_search_agents Read 177 3.8%
update_agent Write 154 3.3%
rpc_call Read 149 3.2%
a2a_send_message Write 143 3.0%
kfdb_find_similar Read 139 3.0%
append_feedback_response Read 134 2.9%
get_feedback Read 131 2.8%
kfdb_feedback_analysis Read 121 2.6%
get_wallet_balance Read 116 2.5%
a2a_query_task Read 113 2.4%
get_agent Read 111 2.4%
transfer_agent Financial 108 2.3%
get_reputation_summary Read 108 2.3%
kfdb_get_agent_details Read 107 2.3%
a2a_task_message Write 105 2.2%
load_agent Read 102 2.2%
is_agent_owner Read 97 2.1%
get_platform_stats Read 94 2.0%
revoke_feedback Destructive 88 1.9%
kfdb_ecosystem_stats Read 88 1.9%
get_registries Read 82 1.7%
a2a_get_task Read 78 1.7%
a2a_cancel_task Destructive 77 1.6%
a2a_list_tasks Read 67 1.4%
get_agent_owner Read 67 1.4%
get_derivation_message Read 57 1.2%
get_supported_chains Read 50 1.1%
get_auth_status Read 48 1.0%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 34.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (138 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 34 tools (no gateway) 4,689 tokens
3 granted tools ~414 tokens −91%
5 granted tools ~690 tokens −85%
10 granted tools ~1,379 tokens −71%

Agent0 token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Agent0 MCP server use?+

Its 34 tool definitions total 4,689 tokens — 2.3% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Agent0 consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Agent0's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Agent0 to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 414 tokens, a 91% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 34 catalogued Agent0 tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Agent0 to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.