Home / Token cost / DataMerge MCP

The DataMerge MCP server costs 4,783 tokens before the first call.

Connect DataMerge and its 23 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The DataMerge MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,783 tokens — 2.5× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 23 tools · 4,783 tokens · 2.4% of 200k · 0.5% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.4%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: DataMerge ranks #1051 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,783 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 208 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
run_contact_search Execute 507 10.6%
run_contact_enrich Execute 422 8.8%
run_company_enrichment Execute 380 7.9%
contact_search Read 342 7.2%
start_company_enrichment_and_wait Execute 332 6.9%
run_contact_search_unenriched Execute 299 6.3%
start_company_enrichment Execute 271 5.7%
contact_search_unenriched Read 260 5.4%
get_company_hierarchy Read 252 5.3%
get_list_items Read 225 4.7%
get_company Read 181 3.8%
contact_enrich Read 156 3.3%
remove_list_item Destructive 132 2.8%
get_company_enrichment_result Read 121 2.5%
configure_datamerge Write 120 2.5%
delete_list Destructive 115 2.4%
get_contact_enrich_status Read 110 2.3%
get_contact_search_status Read 107 2.2%
create_list Write 107 2.2%
get_contact Read 97 2.0%
get_credits_balance Read 86 1.8%
list_lists Read 84 1.8%
health_check Read 77 1.6%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 23.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (208 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 23 tools (no gateway) 4,783 tokens
3 granted tools ~624 tokens −87%
5 granted tools ~1,040 tokens −78%
10 granted tools ~2,080 tokens −57%

DataMerge MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the DataMerge MCP server use?+

Its 23 tool definitions total 4,783 tokens — 2.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does DataMerge MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce DataMerge MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes DataMerge MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 624 tokens, a 87% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 23 catalogued DataMerge MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes DataMerge MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.