Home / Token cost / Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence

The Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence MCP server costs 1,823 tokens before the first call.

Connect Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence and its 8 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 0.9% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence MCP server's tool definitions consume 1,823 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 8 tools · 1,823 tokens · 0.9% of 200k · 0.2% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 0.9%
1M WINDOW 0.2%

Corpus context: Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence ranks #1649 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 1,823 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 228 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
submit_correction Write 323 17.7%
calculate_buildable_envelope Execute 316 17.3%
analyze_property Read 294 16.1%
search_comparable_sales Read 229 12.6%
check_environmental_risks Read 200 11.0%
lookup_zoning Read 157 8.6%
check_flood_zone Read 155 8.5%
get_buildability_score Read 149 8.2%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 8.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (228 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 8 tools (no gateway) 1,823 tokens
3 granted tools ~684 tokens −63%
5 granted tools ~1,139 tokens −38%

Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence MCP server use?+

Its 8 tool definitions total 1,823 tokens — 0.9% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 684 tokens, a 63% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 8 catalogued Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Buildability™ — Property Zoning & Buildability™ Intelligence to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.