Home / Token cost / Taste

The Taste MCP server costs 4,107 tokens before the first call.

Connect Taste and its 17 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.1% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Taste MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,107 tokens — 2.2× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 17 tools · 4,107 tokens · 2.1% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.1%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Taste ranks #1129 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,107 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 242 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
consult_domain_expert Read 535 13.0%
order_think_tank_session_30 Read 344 8.4%
order_think_tank_session_60 Read 344 8.4%
prepare_consult_domain_expert Read 329 8.0%
arbitrate_dispute Read 293 7.1%
request_human_approval Destructive 291 7.1%
verify_reasoning_chain Read 286 7.0%
predict_audience_reaction Read 240 5.8%
review_content Read 215 5.2%
prepublish_review Read 214 5.2%
verify_external_source Read 198 4.8%
request_think_tank_revision Read 182 4.4%
request_illustration_revision Read 179 4.4%
verify_certificate Read 174 4.2%
get_result Read 147 3.6%
list_expert_profiles Read 89 2.2%
list_offerings Read 47 1.1%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 17.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (242 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 17 tools (no gateway) 4,107 tokens
3 granted tools ~725 tokens −82%
5 granted tools ~1,208 tokens −71%
10 granted tools ~2,416 tokens −41%

Taste token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Taste MCP server use?+

Its 17 tool definitions total 4,107 tokens — 2.1% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Taste consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Taste's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Taste to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 725 tokens, a 82% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 17 catalogued Taste tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Taste to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.