Home / Token cost / Bitpoort

The Bitpoort MCP server costs 4,402 tokens before the first call.

Connect Bitpoort and its 41 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.2% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Bitpoort MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,402 tokens — 2.3× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 41 tools · 4,402 tokens · 2.2% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.2%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Bitpoort ranks #1094 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,402 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 107 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
rpc_get_logs Read 210 4.8%
get_token_flows Read 177 4.0%
get_intelligence_feed Read 171 3.9%
get_price_history Read 162 3.7%
rpc_read_contract Read 162 3.7%
get_conviction_signals Read 151 3.4%
get_cross_chain_signals Read 142 3.2%
get_predictions Read 140 3.2%
ask_blockchain Read 139 3.2%
get_btc_flows Read 138 3.1%
get_trending_tokens Read 131 3.0%
get_alarm_feed Read 130 3.0%
get_entity_activity Read 128 2.9%
get_trade_signals Read 128 2.9%
get_whale_activity Read 117 2.7%
get_emerging_tokens Read 116 2.6%
get_logs Read 112 2.5%
get_hl_traders Read 109 2.5%
query_transactions Read 107 2.4%
search_rag Read 107 2.4%
rpc_get_block Read 100 2.3%
rpc_get_balance Read 96 2.2%
get_risk_briefing Read 95 2.2%
get_exchange_flows Read 94 2.1%
get_intent_detections Read 92 2.1%
get_wallet_profile Read 92 2.1%
query_blocks Read 90 2.0%
get_mev_leaderboard Read 88 2.0%
get_hl_market Read 84 1.9%
get_alerts Read 79 1.8%
get_smart_wallets Read 77 1.7%
rpc_get_contract_info Read 76 1.7%
rpc_get_transaction Read 75 1.7%
inspect_block Read 72 1.6%
rpc_trace_transaction Read 71 1.6%
get_network_summary Read 70 1.6%
get_pipeline_status Read 67 1.5%
get_chain_status Read 64 1.5%
get_health Read 56 1.3%
get_stats Read 50 1.1%
get_alarm_categories Read 37 0.8%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 41.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (107 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 41 tools (no gateway) 4,402 tokens
3 granted tools ~322 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~537 tokens −88%
10 granted tools ~1,074 tokens −76%

Bitpoort token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Bitpoort MCP server use?+

Its 41 tool definitions total 4,402 tokens — 2.2% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Bitpoort consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Bitpoort's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Bitpoort to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 322 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 41 catalogued Bitpoort tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Bitpoort to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.