Home / Token cost / Defense MCP

The Defense MCP server costs 11,227 tokens before the first call.

Connect Defense and its 31 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 5.6% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Defense MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 11,227 tokens — 5.9× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 31 tools · 11,227 tokens · 5.6% of 200k · 1.1% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 5.6%
1M WINDOW 1.1%

Corpus context: Defense ranks #150 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 11,227 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 362 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
log_management Write 897 8.0%
defense_mgmt Write 792 7.1%
access_control Write 783 7.0%
firewall Write 636 5.7%
compliance Write 579 5.2%
harden_host Write 577 5.1%
crypto Write 501 4.5%
container_isolation Write 464 4.1%
network_defense Write 456 4.1%
incident_response Write 408 3.6%
container_docker Write 406 3.6%
zero_trust Write 404 3.6%
harden_kernel Write 401 3.6%
malware Write 385 3.4%
integrity Write 374 3.3%
backup Read 328 2.9%
vuln_manage Write 270 2.4%
secrets Write 264 2.4%
waf_manage Write 223 2.0%
patch Write 220 2.0%
dns_security Read 214 1.9%
sudo_session Destructive 194 1.7%
threat_intel Write 194 1.7%
supply_chain Write 184 1.6%
ebpf Execute 183 1.6%
honeypot_manage Write 178 1.6%
app_harden Write 168 1.5%
api_security Write 158 1.4%
process_security Write 149 1.3%
cloud_security Write 124 1.1%
wireless_security Write 113 1.0%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 31.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (362 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 31 tools (no gateway) 11,227 tokens
3 granted tools ~1,086 tokens −90%
5 granted tools ~1,811 tokens −84%
10 granted tools ~3,622 tokens −68%

Defense MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Defense MCP server use?+

Its 31 tool definitions total 11,227 tokens — 5.6% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Defense MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Defense MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Defense MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 1,086 tokens, a 90% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 31 catalogued Defense MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Defense MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.