Home / Token cost / AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy

The AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy MCP server costs 6,421 tokens before the first call.

Connect AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy and its 52 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.2% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy MCP server's tool definitions consume 6,421 tokens — 3.4× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 52 tools · 6,421 tokens · 3.2% of 200k · 0.6% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.2%
1M WINDOW 0.6%

Corpus context: AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy ranks #939 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 6,421 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 123 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
social.publish Destructive 520 8.1%
shorts.merge Read 367 5.7%
article.generate Read 288 4.5%
shorts.script Read 263 4.1%
adapt.generate Read 226 3.5%
shorts.generate Read 219 3.4%
seo.og_image.generate Read 207 3.2%
leadmagnet.generate Execute 203 3.2%
shorts.avatar Read 200 3.1%
session.create Execute 187 2.9%
scout.reddit.result Execute 147 2.3%
scout.x.result Execute 145 2.3%
brand.scan.get Read 145 2.3%
ingest.content.get Read 144 2.2%
leadmagnet.get Read 142 2.2%
ingest.get Read 141 2.2%
leadmagnet.archive Read 141 2.2%
leadmagnet.publish Read 141 2.2%
shorts.get Read 141 2.2%
webhooks.delete Destructive 140 2.2%
products.create Write 140 2.2%
products.delete Destructive 139 2.2%
competitors.scout Read 132 2.1%
seo.internal_links.plan Read 131 2.0%
scout.reddit Execute 125 1.9%
scout.x Execute 121 1.9%
webhooks.deliveries Read 108 1.7%
ingest.batch Write 104 1.6%
article.list Read 92 1.4%
webhooks.register Read 90 1.4%
schedule.list Read 89 1.4%
ingest.create Write 89 1.4%
schedule.gaps Read 81 1.3%
products.search Read 75 1.2%
competitors.discover Write 71 1.1%
gaps.generate Read 70 1.1%
brand.scan Execute 66 1.0%
seo.headings.check Read 62 1.0%
seo.links.analyze Read 58 0.9%
seo.meta_tags.check Read 58 0.9%
seo.og.preview Read 58 0.9%
seo.schema.validate Read 58 0.9%
seo.robots.check Read 57 0.9%
seo.sitemap.check Read 57 0.9%
agent.status Read 32 0.5%
agent.health Read 23 0.4%
agent.me Read 23 0.4%
webhooks.list Read 23 0.4%
gaps.list Read 21 0.3%
personas.list Read 21 0.3%
products.list Read 20 0.3%
settings.get Read 20 0.3%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 52.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (123 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 52 tools (no gateway) 6,421 tokens
3 granted tools ~370 tokens −94%
5 granted tools ~617 tokens −90%
10 granted tools ~1,235 tokens −81%

AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy MCP server use?+

Its 52 tool definitions total 6,421 tokens — 3.2% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 370 tokens, a 94% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 52 catalogued AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes AI Marketing Agent — SEO, Leads & Social by Citedy to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.