Home / Token cost / Curie Commerce

The Curie Commerce MCP server costs 7,205 tokens before the first call.

Connect Curie Commerce and its 29 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.6% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Curie Commerce MCP server's tool definitions consume 7,205 tokens — 3.8× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 29 tools · 7,205 tokens · 3.6% of 200k · 0.7% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.6%
1M WINDOW 0.7%

Corpus context: Curie Commerce ranks #884 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 7,205 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 248 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
curie_wishlist_add Write 541 7.5%
solve_job Read 471 6.5%
lookup_catalog Read 425 5.9%
curie_cart_aggregate_add Write 425 5.9%
search_catalog Read 399 5.5%
compare_products Read 363 5.0%
initiate_checkout Write 336 4.7%
update_checkout Write 330 4.6%
get_product_details Read 285 4.0%
update_cart Write 265 3.7%
curie_try_on_3d Read 255 3.5%
get_order Read 245 3.4%
get_suggested_prompts Read 238 3.3%
curie_wishlist_move_to_cart Write 229 3.2%
get_recommendations Read 214 3.0%
complete_checkout Write 206 2.9%
create_cart Write 204 2.8%
curie_cart_aggregate_update_quantity Write 194 2.7%
curie_wishlist_get Read 189 2.6%
search_shop_policies_and_faqs Read 186 2.6%
curie_cart_aggregate_get Read 172 2.4%
get_cart Read 161 2.2%
get_checkout Read 159 2.2%
cancel_cart Destructive 147 2.0%
cancel_checkout Destructive 136 1.9%
curie_cart_aggregate_remove Destructive 122 1.7%
curie_wishlist_remove Destructive 122 1.7%
get_availability Read 116 1.6%
get_brand_context Read 70 1.0%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 29.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (248 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 29 tools (no gateway) 7,205 tokens
3 granted tools ~745 tokens −90%
5 granted tools ~1,242 tokens −83%
10 granted tools ~2,484 tokens −66%

Curie Commerce token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Curie Commerce MCP server use?+

Its 29 tool definitions total 7,205 tokens — 3.6% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Curie Commerce consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Curie Commerce's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Curie Commerce to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 745 tokens, a 90% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 29 catalogued Curie Commerce tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Curie Commerce to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.