Home / Token cost / Blackveil Dns

The Blackveil Dns MCP server costs 6,016 tokens before the first call.

Connect Blackveil Dns and its 51 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Blackveil Dns MCP server's tool definitions consume 6,016 tokens — 3.2× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 51 tools · 6,016 tokens · 3.0% of 200k · 0.6% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.0%
1M WINDOW 0.6%

Corpus context: Blackveil Dns ranks #962 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 6,016 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 118 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
compare_baseline Read 337 5.6%
scan_domain Read 207 3.4%
validate_fix Read 183 3.0%
generate_mta_sts_policy Write 152 2.5%
generate_rollout_plan Write 152 2.5%
check_dkim Read 150 2.5%
explain_finding Read 149 2.5%
generate_dmarc_record Write 145 2.4%
check_fast_flux Read 143 2.4%
generate_spf_record Write 143 2.4%
check_resolver_consistency Read 138 2.3%
batch_scan Read 132 2.2%
check_rbl Read 130 2.2%
analyze_drift Read 129 2.1%
map_supply_chain Write 124 2.1%
get_provider_insights Read 117 1.9%
map_compliance Read 117 1.9%
resolve_spf_chain Write 116 1.9%
cymru_asn Read 115 1.9%
generate_dkim_config Write 115 1.9%
compare_domains Read 114 1.9%
rdap_lookup Read 112 1.9%
check_dnssec_chain Read 111 1.8%
check_nsec_walkability Read 111 1.8%
check_dbl Read 109 1.8%
simulate_attack_paths Read 105 1.7%
discover_subdomains Read 103 1.7%
check_dmarc Read 102 1.7%
check_dane_https Read 101 1.7%
check_spf Read 101 1.7%
check_mx Read 99 1.6%
check_ns Read 99 1.6%
check_ssl Read 99 1.6%
check_svcb_https Read 99 1.6%
check_caa Read 98 1.6%
check_dnssec Read 98 1.6%
check_subdomailing Read 98 1.6%
check_lookalikes Read 94 1.6%
assess_spoofability Read 93 1.5%
check_http_security Read 93 1.5%
check_txt_hygiene Read 92 1.5%
get_benchmark Read 92 1.5%
check_shadow_domains Read 91 1.5%
check_mta_sts Read 90 1.5%
check_mx_reputation Read 90 1.5%
check_zone_hygiene Read 90 1.5%
check_dane Read 89 1.5%
check_bimi Read 88 1.5%
check_tlsrpt Read 88 1.5%
generate_fix_plan Write 87 1.4%
check_srv Read 86 1.4%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 51.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (118 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 51 tools (no gateway) 6,016 tokens
3 granted tools ~354 tokens −94%
5 granted tools ~590 tokens −90%
10 granted tools ~1,180 tokens −80%

Blackveil Dns token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Blackveil Dns MCP server use?+

Its 51 tool definitions total 6,016 tokens — 3.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Blackveil Dns consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Blackveil Dns's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Blackveil Dns to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 354 tokens, a 94% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 51 catalogued Blackveil Dns tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Blackveil Dns to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.