Home / Token cost / clariBI

The clariBI MCP server costs 3,663 tokens before the first call.

Connect clariBI and its 24 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.8% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The clariBI MCP server's tool definitions consume 3,663 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 24 tools · 3,663 tokens · 1.8% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.8%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: clariBI ranks #1191 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 3,663 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 153 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
create_forecast Write 427 11.7%
upload_data_source Write 361 9.9%
ingest_url_data_source Read 299 8.2%
request_oauth_integration_url Read 233 6.4%
run_analysis Execute 216 5.9%
register_account Write 214 5.8%
generate_report Write 172 4.7%
verify_email Read 168 4.6%
run_forecast Execute 144 3.9%
list_data_sources Read 144 3.9%
list_forecasts Read 141 3.8%
get_forecast_run Read 132 3.6%
get_data_source_schema Read 129 3.5%
list_reports Read 121 3.3%
list_dashboards Read 120 3.3%
create_checkout_session Write 117 3.2%
check_integration_status Read 101 2.8%
check_pricing Read 79 2.2%
get_analysis_status Read 73 2.0%
get_dashboard Read 71 1.9%
get_forecast Read 58 1.6%
get_report Read 57 1.6%
get_usage Read 45 1.2%
get_billing_status Read 41 1.1%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 24.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (153 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 24 tools (no gateway) 3,663 tokens
3 granted tools ~458 tokens −88%
5 granted tools ~763 tokens −79%
10 granted tools ~1,526 tokens −58%

clariBI token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the clariBI MCP server use?+

Its 24 tool definitions total 3,663 tokens — 1.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does clariBI consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce clariBI's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes clariBI to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 458 tokens, a 88% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 24 catalogued clariBI tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes clariBI to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.