Home / Token cost / Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database

The Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database MCP server costs 4,062 tokens before the first call.

Connect Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database and its 17 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,062 tokens — 2.1× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 17 tools · 4,062 tokens · 2.0% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.0%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database ranks #1140 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,062 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 239 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
search_vulnerabilities Read 906 22.3%
search_exploits Read 871 21.4%
get_vulnerability Read 297 7.3%
generate_finding Write 296 7.3%
get_exploit_code Read 229 5.6%
get_nuclei_templates Read 196 4.8%
audit_stack Read 186 4.6%
get_exploit_analysis Read 185 4.6%
lookup_alt_id Read 139 3.4%
list_products Read 135 3.3%
list_authors Read 124 3.1%
get_cwe Read 123 3.0%
get_author Read 114 2.8%
list_cwes Read 70 1.7%
check_health Read 67 1.6%
list_vendors Read 63 1.6%
get_platform_stats Read 61 1.5%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 17.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (239 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 17 tools (no gateway) 4,062 tokens
3 granted tools ~717 tokens −82%
5 granted tools ~1,195 tokens −71%
10 granted tools ~2,389 tokens −41%

Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database MCP server use?+

Its 17 tool definitions total 4,062 tokens — 2.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 717 tokens, a 82% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 17 catalogued Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Exploit Intelligence Platform — CVE, Vulnerability and Exploit Database to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.