Home / Token cost / DataMerge

The DataMerge MCP server costs 2,679 tokens before the first call.

Connect DataMerge and its 20 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.3% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The DataMerge MCP server's tool definitions consume 2,679 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 20 tools · 2,679 tokens · 1.3% of 200k · 0.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.3%
1M WINDOW 0.3%

Corpus context: DataMerge ranks #1373 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 2,679 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 134 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
start_company_enrichment_and_wait Execute 312 11.6%
contact_search Read 271 10.1%
start_company_enrichment Execute 251 9.4%
get_company_hierarchy Read 224 8.4%
get_list_items Read 196 7.3%
start_lookalike Execute 165 6.2%
get_company Read 161 6.0%
contact_enrich Read 127 4.7%
remove_list_item Destructive 100 3.7%
configure_datamerge Write 100 3.7%
get_company_enrichment_result Read 95 3.5%
get_lookalike_status Read 89 3.3%
delete_list Destructive 86 3.2%
get_contact_enrich_status Read 84 3.1%
get_contact_search_status Read 81 3.0%
create_list Write 79 2.9%
get_contact Read 71 2.7%
get_credits_balance Read 66 2.5%
list_lists Read 64 2.4%
health_check Read 57 2.1%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 20.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (134 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 20 tools (no gateway) 2,679 tokens
3 granted tools ~402 tokens −85%
5 granted tools ~670 tokens −75%
10 granted tools ~1,340 tokens −50%

DataMerge token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the DataMerge MCP server use?+

Its 20 tool definitions total 2,679 tokens — 1.3% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does DataMerge consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce DataMerge's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes DataMerge to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 402 tokens, a 85% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 20 catalogued DataMerge tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes DataMerge to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.