Home / Token cost / Ghost CMS MCP Server

The Ghost CMS MCP Server MCP server costs 1,192 tokens before the first call.

Connect Ghost CMS MCP Server and its 44 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 0.6% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Ghost CMS MCP Server MCP server's tool definitions consume 1,192 tokens — below the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 44 tools · 1,192 tokens · 0.6% of 200k · 0.1% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 0.6%
1M WINDOW 0.1%

Corpus context: Ghost CMS MCP Server ranks #2027 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 1,192 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 27 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
posts_add Write 35 2.9%
admin_site_ping Read 30 2.5%
members_browse Read 30 2.5%
posts_browse Read 30 2.5%
members_add Write 30 2.5%
config_echo Read 29 2.4%
members_read Read 29 2.4%
posts_read Read 29 2.4%
tags_read Read 29 2.4%
users_read Read 29 2.4%
invites_browse Read 28 2.3%
newsletters_read Read 28 2.3%
invites_delete Destructive 27 2.3%
newsletters_delete Destructive 27 2.3%
webhooks_delete Destructive 27 2.3%
newsletters_browse Read 27 2.3%
offers_browse Read 27 2.3%
offers_read Read 27 2.3%
roles_browse Read 27 2.3%
roles_read Read 27 2.3%
tiers_browse Read 27 2.3%
tiers_read Read 27 2.3%
users_browse Read 27 2.3%
invites_add Write 27 2.3%
members_delete Destructive 26 2.2%
offers_delete Destructive 26 2.2%
posts_delete Destructive 26 2.2%
tags_delete Destructive 26 2.2%
tiers_delete Destructive 26 2.2%
tags_browse Read 26 2.2%
newsletters_add Write 26 2.2%
newsletters_edit Write 26 2.2%
offers_add Write 26 2.2%
tiers_add Write 26 2.2%
webhooks_add Write 26 2.2%
webhooks_edit Write 26 2.2%
users_delete Destructive 25 2.1%
members_edit Write 25 2.1%
offers_edit Write 25 2.1%
posts_edit Write 25 2.1%
tags_add Write 25 2.1%
tags_edit Write 25 2.1%
tiers_edit Write 25 2.1%
users_edit Write 25 2.1%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 44.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (27 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 44 tools (no gateway) 1,192 tokens
3 granted tools ~81 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~135 tokens −89%
10 granted tools ~271 tokens −77%

Ghost CMS MCP Server token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Ghost CMS MCP Server MCP server use?+

Its 44 tool definitions total 1,192 tokens — 0.6% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Ghost CMS MCP Server consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Ghost CMS MCP Server's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Ghost CMS MCP Server to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 81 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 44 catalogued Ghost CMS MCP Server tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Ghost CMS MCP Server to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.