Home / Token cost / Malaysia Transit MCP

The Malaysia Transit MCP server costs 4,770 tokens before the first call.

Connect Malaysia Transit and its 43 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Malaysia Transit MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,770 tokens — 2.5× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 43 tools · 4,770 tokens · 2.4% of 200k · 0.5% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.4%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: Malaysia Transit ranks #1052 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,770 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 111 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
find_nearby_stops_with_arrivals Read 229 4.8%
get_route_departures Read 220 4.6%
get_next_departure Read 208 4.4%
get_route_origin Read 203 4.3%
find_nearby_ktm_stations Read 202 4.2%
find_nearby_stops Read 195 4.1%
find_nearby_stops_with_routes Read 184 3.9%
get_route_status Read 177 3.7%
calculate_journey_fare Read 174 3.6%
get_route_schedule Read 173 3.6%
search_stops Read 171 3.6%
get_stop_routes Read 160 3.4%
calculate_fare Read 158 3.3%
detect_location_area Read 149 3.1%
get_fare_routes Read 143 3.0%
get_ktm_station_departures Read 133 2.8%
get_route_stops_for_fare Read 126 2.6%
calculate_ktm_komuter_fare Read 118 2.5%
get_api_analytics Read 118 2.5%
get_route_stops Read 105 2.2%
get_route_details Read 96 2.0%
get_penang_ferry_schedule Read 95 2.0%
get_route_directions_for_fare Read 93 1.9%
get_live_vehicles Read 84 1.8%
get_ktm_stations Read 79 1.7%
get_route_geometry Read 77 1.6%
get_ktm_schedules Read 76 1.6%
get_stop_arrivals Read 76 1.6%
get_stop_details Read 72 1.5%
get_area_analytics Read 71 1.5%
get_area_info Read 60 1.3%
get_ktm_komuter_stations Read 59 1.2%
get_provider_status Read 57 1.2%
list_routes Read 56 1.2%
get_penang_ferry_overview Read 53 1.1%
get_penang_ferry_next_departure Read 47 1.0%
get_ktm_komuter_fare_matrix Read 45 0.9%
get_penang_ferry_terminals Read 44 0.9%
list_service_areas Read 44 0.9%
get_penang_ferry_fare Read 39 0.8%
get_debug_info Read 36 0.8%
hello Read 33 0.7%
get_system_health Read 32 0.7%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 43.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (111 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 43 tools (no gateway) 4,770 tokens
3 granted tools ~333 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~555 tokens −88%
10 granted tools ~1,109 tokens −77%

Malaysia Transit MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Malaysia Transit MCP server use?+

Its 43 tool definitions total 4,770 tokens — 2.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Malaysia Transit MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Malaysia Transit MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Malaysia Transit MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 333 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 43 catalogued Malaysia Transit MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Malaysia Transit MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.