Home / Token cost / Invarium

The Invarium MCP server costs 5,295 tokens before the first call.

Connect Invarium and its 19 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.6% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Invarium MCP server's tool definitions consume 5,295 tokens — 2.8× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 19 tools · 5,295 tokens · 2.6% of 200k · 0.5% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.6%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: Invarium ranks #1004 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 5,295 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 279 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
invarium_generate_tests Write 969 18.3%
invarium_sync_results Execute 691 13.1%
invarium_create_scenario Write 396 7.5%
invarium_manage_scenario Destructive 384 7.3%
invarium_get_tests Read 355 6.7%
invarium_get_test_run Read 306 5.8%
invarium_prepare_blueprint Execute 267 5.0%
invarium_list_scenarios Read 232 4.4%
invarium_upload_blueprint Write 226 4.3%
invarium_list_test_runs Read 213 4.0%
invarium_get_audit Read 202 3.8%
invarium_delete_agent Destructive 190 3.6%
invarium_get_workflow Read 158 3.0%
invarium_setup_tracing Write 142 2.7%
invarium_usage Read 133 2.5%
invarium_connect Write 132 2.5%
invarium_get_agent Read 119 2.2%
invarium_dashboard Execute 118 2.2%
invarium_list_agents Read 62 1.2%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 19.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (279 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 19 tools (no gateway) 5,295 tokens
3 granted tools ~836 tokens −84%
5 granted tools ~1,393 tokens −74%
10 granted tools ~2,787 tokens −47%

Invarium token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Invarium MCP server use?+

Its 19 tool definitions total 5,295 tokens — 2.6% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Invarium consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Invarium's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Invarium to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 836 tokens, a 84% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 19 catalogued Invarium tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Invarium to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.