Home / Token cost / DeltaSignal ATLAS-7

The DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 MCP server costs 12,772 tokens before the first call.

Connect DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 and its 33 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 6.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 MCP server's tool definitions consume 12,772 tokens — 6.7× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 33 tools · 12,772 tokens · 6.4% of 200k · 1.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 6.4%
1M WINDOW 1.3%

Corpus context: DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 ranks #117 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 12,772 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 387 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
deltasignal_issuer_deep_report Read 735 5.8%
deltasignal_covenant_stress Read 697 5.5%
strategix_visual_spec_package Read 632 4.9%
strategix_diagram_render Read 614 4.8%
deltasignal_atlas7_calculation_history Read 570 4.5%
deltasignal_atlas7_point_in_time_history Read 561 4.4%
strategix_diagram_validate Read 539 4.2%
deltasignal_alpha_opportunities Read 527 4.1%
deltasignal_thesis_readiness Execute 517 4.0%
deltasignal_atlas7_companyfacts_history Read 490 3.8%
deltasignal_atlas_history Read 486 3.8%
deltasignal_company_report Write 484 3.8%
deltasignal_thesis_create Write 448 3.5%
deltasignal_alpha_signals Read 447 3.5%
deltasignal_alpha_opportunities_audit Read 435 3.4%
deltasignal_company_fundamentals Write 400 3.1%
deltasignal_covenant_stress_natural Read 357 2.8%
deltasignal_daily_change_evidence Read 354 2.8%
deltasignal_peer_ranking Write 349 2.7%
deltasignal_spectra_field_map Write 296 2.3%
deltasignal_morning_brief_natural Read 288 2.3%
deltasignal_top_stressed_natural Read 286 2.2%
deltasignal_quick_ticker_check Read 278 2.2%
deltasignal_top_stressed Read 254 2.0%
deltasignal_public_daily_brief Read 244 1.9%
deltasignal_morning_brief Read 237 1.9%
deltasignal_alpha_sweep Read 219 1.7%
deltasignal_pressure_board Read 197 1.5%
deltasignal_readiness Execute 188 1.5%
deltasignal_risk_distribution Write 166 1.3%
deltasignal_atlas7_audit_status Read 160 1.3%
strategix_visual_spec_search Read 159 1.2%
deltasignal_daily_changes Write 158 1.2%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 33.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (387 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 33 tools (no gateway) 12,772 tokens
3 granted tools ~1,161 tokens −91%
5 granted tools ~1,935 tokens −85%
10 granted tools ~3,870 tokens −70%

DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 MCP server use?+

Its 33 tool definitions total 12,772 tokens — 6.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce DeltaSignal ATLAS-7's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 1,161 tokens, a 91% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 33 catalogued DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes DeltaSignal ATLAS-7 to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.