Home / Token cost / GoldenMatch

The GoldenMatch MCP server costs 3,644 tokens before the first call.

Connect GoldenMatch and its 42 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.8% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The GoldenMatch MCP server's tool definitions consume 3,644 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 42 tools · 3,644 tokens · 1.8% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.8%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: GoldenMatch ranks #1198 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 3,644 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 87 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
create_domain Write 304 8.3%
add_correction Write 178 4.9%
pprl_link Execute 177 4.9%
fix_quality Execute 165 4.5%
match_record Read 152 4.2%
suggest_config Read 149 4.1%
run_transforms Execute 117 3.2%
learn_thresholds Read 113 3.1%
pprl_auto_config Read 111 3.0%
scan_quality Read 102 2.8%
list_corrections Read 101 2.8%
find_duplicates Read 97 2.7%
auto_configure Write 94 2.6%
agent_approve_reject Write 93 2.6%
identity_resolve Write 91 2.5%
test_domain Read 88 2.4%
identity_merge Write 87 2.4%
identity_split Read 84 2.3%
list_clusters Read 83 2.3%
export_results Write 78 2.1%
unmerge_record Destructive 76 2.1%
memory_export Write 75 2.1%
explain_match Read 70 1.9%
agent_explain_pair Read 67 1.8%
identity_list Read 67 1.8%
controller_telemetry Read 66 1.8%
memory_stats Read 66 1.8%
shatter_cluster Read 62 1.7%
agent_match_sources Read 58 1.6%
identity_history Read 57 1.6%
get_cluster Read 54 1.5%
agent_deduplicate Execute 50 1.4%
get_golden_record Read 50 1.4%
agent_compare_strategies Read 49 1.3%
agent_explain_cluster Read 42 1.2%
analyze_data Read 42 1.2%
identity_conflicts Read 42 1.2%
suggest_pprl Read 42 1.2%
agent_review_queue Read 38 1.0%
profile_data Read 37 1.0%
get_stats Read 36 1.0%
list_domains Read 34 0.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 42.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (87 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 42 tools (no gateway) 3,644 tokens
3 granted tools ~260 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~434 tokens −88%
10 granted tools ~868 tokens −76%

GoldenMatch token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the GoldenMatch MCP server use?+

Its 42 tool definitions total 3,644 tokens — 1.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does GoldenMatch consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce GoldenMatch's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes GoldenMatch to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 260 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 42 catalogued GoldenMatch tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes GoldenMatch to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.