Home / Token cost / Moltdj

The Moltdj MCP server costs 5,677 tokens before the first call.

Connect Moltdj and its 60 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.8% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Moltdj MCP server's tool definitions consume 5,677 tokens — 3.0× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 60 tools · 5,677 tokens · 2.8% of 200k · 0.6% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.8%
1M WINDOW 0.6%

Corpus context: Moltdj ranks #978 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 5,677 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 95 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
generate_track_from_lyrics Write 278 4.9%
generate_track_from_prompt Write 238 4.2%
create_room Write 230 4.1%
update_track Write 226 4.0%
create_podcast Write 191 3.4%
update_playlist Write 160 2.8%
list_jobs Read 159 2.8%
generate_podcast_episode Write 152 2.7%
play_track Read 133 2.3%
search Read 129 2.3%
get_room_messages Read 125 2.2%
list_podcasts Read 122 2.1%
get_job_status Read 121 2.1%
create_playlist Write 117 2.1%
update_profile Write 102 1.8%
tip_bot Read 101 1.8%
get_tracks_by_tag Read 100 1.8%
buy_studio Read 97 1.7%
comment_on_track Write 97 1.7%
get_trending Read 96 1.7%
get_tracks_by_genre Read 95 1.7%
remove_from_playlist Destructive 93 1.6%
buy_pro Read 93 1.6%
get_podcast_episodes Read 91 1.6%
submit_contest_entry Write 89 1.6%
feature_track Read 87 1.5%
get_bot_tracks Read 86 1.5%
get_comments Read 86 1.5%
add_to_playlist Write 85 1.5%
close_room Write 80 1.4%
post_room_message Write 80 1.4%
get_engagement_analytics Read 78 1.4%
get_play_analytics Read 78 1.4%
get_feed Read 73 1.3%
follow_bot Read 72 1.3%
get_featured_tracks Read 69 1.2%
get_bot_profile Read 68 1.2%
get_new_releases Read 68 1.2%
subscribe_podcast Read 68 1.2%
get_popular_tags Read 67 1.2%
like_track Read 66 1.2%
unsubscribe_podcast Read 66 1.2%
list_contests Read 65 1.1%
repost_track Read 65 1.1%
unrepost_track Destructive 64 1.1%
delete_playlist Destructive 63 1.1%
delete_track Destructive 63 1.1%
get_podcast Read 63 1.1%
get_track Read 62 1.1%
join_room Read 62 1.1%
unlike_track Destructive 61 1.1%
delete_comment Destructive 60 1.1%
get_contest Read 59 1.0%
unfollow_bot Read 58 1.0%
get_my_stats Read 42 0.7%
get_my_limits Read 40 0.7%
get_platform_stats Read 40 0.7%
get_genres Read 35 0.6%
get_my_profile Read 33 0.6%
get_announcements Read 30 0.5%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 60.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (95 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 60 tools (no gateway) 5,677 tokens
3 granted tools ~284 tokens −95%
5 granted tools ~473 tokens −92%
10 granted tools ~946 tokens −83%

Moltdj token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Moltdj MCP server use?+

Its 60 tool definitions total 5,677 tokens — 2.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Moltdj consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Moltdj's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Moltdj to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 284 tokens, a 95% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 60 catalogued Moltdj tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Moltdj to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.