Home / Token cost / Homecastr Remote

The Homecastr Remote MCP server costs 326 tokens before the first call.

Connect Homecastr Remote and its 3 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 0.2% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Homecastr Remote MCP server's tool definitions consume 326 tokens — below the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 3 tools · 326 tokens · 0.2% of 200k · 0.0% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 0.2%
1M WINDOW 0.0%

Corpus context: Homecastr Remote ranks #3035 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 326 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 109 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
forecast_by_address Read 136 41.7%
forecast_by_h3_cell Read 117 35.9%
forecast_by_parcel Read 73 22.4%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 3.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (109 tokens each).

At 3 tools, Homecastr Remote is already a small surface — the win here is policy control and audit rather than token savings.

Homecastr Remote token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Homecastr Remote MCP server use?+

Its 3 tool definitions total 326 tokens — 0.2% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Homecastr Remote consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Homecastr Remote's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Homecastr Remote to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 3 catalogued Homecastr Remote tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Homecastr Remote to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.