Home / Token cost / SODAX Builders MCP

The SODAX Builders MCP server costs 5,676 tokens before the first call.

Connect SODAX Builders and its 38 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.8% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The SODAX Builders MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 5,676 tokens — 3.0× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 38 tools · 5,676 tokens · 2.8% of 200k · 0.6% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.8%
1M WINDOW 0.6%

Corpus context: SODAX Builders ranks #979 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 5,676 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 149 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
sodax_get_volume Read 460 8.1%
sodax_get_solver_quote Read 389 6.9%
sodax_relay_submit_tx Write 308 5.4%
sodax_get_amm_pool_candles Read 228 4.0%
sodax_get_user_transactions Read 223 3.9%
sodax_relay_get_packet Read 221 3.9%
sodax_relay_get_transaction_packets Read 199 3.5%
sodax_get_solver_oracle Read 190 3.3%
sodax_get_asset_suppliers Read 178 3.1%
sodax_get_asset_borrowers Read 175 3.1%
sodax_get_swap_tokens Read 158 2.8%
sodax_get_amm_positions Read 153 2.7%
sodax_get_hub_assets Read 152 2.7%
sodax_get_orderbook Read 151 2.7%
docs_getPage Read 150 2.6%
sodax_get_all_borrowers Read 149 2.6%
sodax_get_solver_intent Read 149 2.6%
sodax_get_intent Read 128 2.3%
sodax_get_partner_summary Read 127 2.2%
sodax_get_transaction Read 126 2.2%
sodax_get_partners Read 122 2.1%
sodax_get_money_market_asset Read 117 2.1%
docs_searchDocumentation Read 113 2.0%
sodax_get_user_position Read 113 2.0%
sodax_get_money_market_assets Read 110 1.9%
sodax_get_money_market_tokens Read 110 1.9%
sodax_get_relay_chain_id_map Read 100 1.8%
sodax_get_all_config Read 99 1.7%
sodax_get_all_chains_configs Read 98 1.7%
sodax_get_supported_chains Read 97 1.7%
sodax_get_token_supply Read 93 1.6%
sodax_get_circulating_supply Read 92 1.6%
sodax_get_money_market_reserve_assets Read 91 1.6%
sodax_get_total_supply Read 89 1.6%
sodax_refresh_cache Destructive 67 1.2%
docs_refresh Read 52 0.9%
docs_list_tools Read 50 0.9%
docs_health Read 49 0.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 38.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (149 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 38 tools (no gateway) 5,676 tokens
3 granted tools ~448 tokens −92%
5 granted tools ~747 tokens −87%
10 granted tools ~1,494 tokens −74%

SODAX Builders MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the SODAX Builders MCP server use?+

Its 38 tool definitions total 5,676 tokens — 2.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does SODAX Builders MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce SODAX Builders MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes SODAX Builders MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 448 tokens, a 92% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 38 catalogued SODAX Builders MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes SODAX Builders MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.