Home / Token cost / SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence

The SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence MCP server costs 2,267 tokens before the first call.

Connect SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence and its 22 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.1% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence MCP server's tool definitions consume 2,267 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 22 tools · 2,267 tokens · 1.1% of 200k · 0.2% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.1%
1M WINDOW 0.2%

Corpus context: SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence ranks #1488 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 2,267 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 103 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
travel_rule_screen Read 215 9.5%
transaction_screen Read 186 8.2%
monitor_subscribe Read 173 7.6%
compliance_wallet_entity Read 165 7.3%
compliance_watchlist Read 155 6.8%
network_scan Read 131 5.8%
compliance_wallet Read 125 5.5%
due_diligence Read 121 5.3%
facilitator_kya Read 114 5.0%
country_brief Read 113 5.0%
compliance_jurisdiction_risk Read 97 4.3%
macro_indicators Read 78 3.4%
monitor_check Read 77 3.4%
stock_market Read 69 3.0%
forex_rates Read 67 3.0%
weather Read 65 2.9%
compliance_mauritius Read 64 2.8%
fuel_prices Read 64 2.8%
govdata_search Read 57 2.5%
monetary_policy Read 45 2.0%
country_snapshot Read 43 1.9%
facilitator_supported Read 43 1.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 22.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (103 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 22 tools (no gateway) 2,267 tokens
3 granted tools ~309 tokens −86%
5 granted tools ~515 tokens −77%
10 granted tools ~1,030 tokens −55%

SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence MCP server use?+

Its 22 tool definitions total 2,267 tokens — 1.1% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 309 tokens, a 86% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 22 catalogued SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes SENTINEL Compliance Intelligence to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.