Home / Token cost / Singularity Layer MCP

The Singularity Layer MCP server costs 6,214 tokens before the first call.

Connect Singularity Layer and its 38 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.1% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Singularity Layer MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 6,214 tokens — 3.3× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 38 tools · 6,214 tokens · 3.1% of 200k · 0.6% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.1%
1M WINDOW 0.6%

Corpus context: Singularity Layer ranks #951 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 6,214 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 164 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
update_endpoint Write 473 7.6%
update_product Write 423 6.8%
create_endpoint_with_payment Write 419 6.7%
request_endpoint_creation_payment Write 386 6.2%
create_campaign Write 369 5.9%
browse_marketplace Read 308 5.0%
prepare_agent_registration Write 268 4.3%
submit_agent_feedback Write 209 3.4%
verify_agent_wallet_challenge Read 204 3.3%
topup_endpoint_with_payment Write 182 2.9%
update_campaign Write 172 2.8%
purchase_endpoint_credits_with_payment Read 156 2.5%
request_endpoint_topup_payment Write 155 2.5%
request_agent_wallet_challenge Write 151 2.4%
set_webhook Write 146 2.3%
delete_endpoint Destructive 144 2.3%
purchase_product_with_payment Read 144 2.3%
request_endpoint_credit_purchase_payment Read 131 2.1%
finalize_agent_update Financial 130 2.1%
request_product_purchase_payment Read 129 2.1%
prepare_agent_update Write 128 2.1%
get_endpoint_stats Read 122 2.0%
get_endpoint_details Read 119 1.9%
get_agent Read 112 1.8%
remove_webhook Destructive 109 1.8%
list_my_endpoints Read 100 1.6%
finalize_agent_registration Financial 96 1.5%
list_my_products Read 96 1.5%
list_agents Read 93 1.5%
list_my_campaigns Read 93 1.5%
list_my_agent_bindable_endpoints Read 89 1.4%
list_my_registered_agents Read 81 1.3%
get_featured Read 64 1.0%
get_top_rated Read 61 1.0%
get_listing Read 51 0.8%
get_agent_registry_info Read 48 0.8%
list_networks Read 27 0.4%
list_categories Read 26 0.4%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 38.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (164 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 38 tools (no gateway) 6,214 tokens
3 granted tools ~491 tokens −92%
5 granted tools ~818 tokens −87%
10 granted tools ~1,635 tokens −74%

Singularity Layer MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Singularity Layer MCP server use?+

Its 38 tool definitions total 6,214 tokens — 3.1% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Singularity Layer MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Singularity Layer MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Singularity Layer MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 491 tokens, a 92% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 38 catalogued Singularity Layer MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Singularity Layer MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.