Home / Token cost / Local Intel

The Local Intel MCP server costs 4,025 tokens before the first call.

Connect Local Intel and its 27 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Local Intel MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,025 tokens — 2.1× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 27 tools · 4,025 tokens · 2.0% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.0%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Local Intel ranks #1145 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,025 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 149 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
local_intel_rfq Write 405 10.1%
local_intel_query Read 250 6.2%
local_intel_for_agent Read 241 6.0%
local_intel_project Execute 228 5.7%
local_intel_sector_gap Read 218 5.4%
local_intel_compare Read 185 4.6%
local_intel_realtor Read 159 4.0%
local_intel_ask Read 153 3.8%
local_intel_context Read 152 3.8%
local_intel_nearby Read 144 3.6%
local_intel_tide Read 143 3.6%
local_intel_search Read 140 3.5%
local_intel_restaurant Read 137 3.4%
local_intel_construction Read 135 3.4%
local_intel_retail Read 133 3.3%
local_intel_healthcare Read 130 3.2%
local_intel_decline_response Read 128 3.2%
local_intel_signal Read 126 3.1%
local_intel_oracle Read 124 3.1%
local_intel_corridor Read 113 2.8%
local_intel_bedrock Read 110 2.7%
local_intel_zone Read 109 2.7%
local_intel_book Read 105 2.6%
local_intel_complete Write 79 2.0%
local_intel_rfq_status Read 73 1.8%
local_intel_changes Read 67 1.7%
local_intel_stats Read 38 0.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 27.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (149 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 27 tools (no gateway) 4,025 tokens
3 granted tools ~447 tokens −89%
5 granted tools ~745 tokens −81%
10 granted tools ~1,491 tokens −63%

Local Intel token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Local Intel MCP server use?+

Its 27 tool definitions total 4,025 tokens — 2.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Local Intel consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Local Intel's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Local Intel to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 447 tokens, a 89% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 27 catalogued Local Intel tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Local Intel to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.