Home / Token cost / Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring

The Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring MCP server costs 2,723 tokens before the first call.

Connect Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring and its 11 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring MCP server's tool definitions consume 2,723 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 11 tools · 2,723 tokens · 1.4% of 200k · 0.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.4%
1M WINDOW 0.3%

Corpus context: Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring ranks #1354 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 2,723 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 248 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
audit_dependencies Write 436 16.0%
audit_dependency_tree Read 431 15.8%
audit_github_repo Read 332 12.2%
lookup_go_module Read 324 11.9%
lookup_npm_package Read 237 8.7%
lookup_cargo_crate Read 216 7.9%
lookup_pypi_package Read 209 7.7%
lookup_github_repo Read 197 7.2%
lookup_business Read 126 4.6%
query_commitment Read 110 4.0%
lookup_business_by_org Read 105 3.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 11.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (248 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 11 tools (no gateway) 2,723 tokens
3 granted tools ~743 tokens −73%
5 granted tools ~1,238 tokens −55%
10 granted tools ~2,475 tokens −9%

Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring MCP server use?+

Its 11 tool definitions total 2,723 tokens — 1.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 743 tokens, a 73% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 11 catalogued Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Commit — Supply Chain Risk Scoring to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.