Home / Token cost / RationalBloks

The RationalBloks MCP server costs 7,671 tokens before the first call.

Connect RationalBloks and its 44 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.8% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The RationalBloks MCP server's tool definitions consume 7,671 tokens — 4.0× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 44 tools · 7,671 tokens · 3.8% of 200k · 0.8% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.8%
1M WINDOW 0.8%

Corpus context: RationalBloks ranks #518 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 7,671 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 174 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
create_project Write 867 11.3%
create_graph_project Write 806 10.5%
traverse_graph Execute 327 4.3%
bulk_create_graph_nodes Write 321 4.2%
bulk_create_graph_relationships Write 307 4.0%
update_schema Write 304 4.0%
update_graph_schema Write 271 3.5%
fulltext_search_graph Read 252 3.3%
create_graph_node Write 251 3.3%
search_graph_nodes Read 250 3.3%
create_graph_relationship Write 245 3.2%
deploy_staging Execute 192 2.5%
get_node_relationships Read 170 2.2%
list_graph_nodes Read 160 2.1%
get_project_info Read 156 2.0%
get_graph_template_schemas Read 155 2.0%
rollback_project Read 151 2.0%
update_graph_node Write 150 2.0%
get_template_schemas Read 145 1.9%
rollback_graph_project Read 145 1.9%
get_graph_data_schema Read 140 1.8%
deploy_graph_staging Execute 137 1.8%
get_schema Read 137 1.8%
delete_graph_node Destructive 136 1.8%
get_job_status Read 136 1.8%
get_graph_node Read 131 1.7%
delete_graph_relationship Destructive 119 1.6%
get_graph_statistics Read 100 1.3%
get_graph_schema_at_version Read 96 1.3%
get_version_history Read 93 1.2%
get_graph_schema Read 81 1.1%
get_graph_version_history Read 80 1.0%
get_graph_project_info Read 77 1.0%
get_schema_at_version Read 71 0.9%
rename_project Write 70 0.9%
deploy_graph_production Execute 67 0.9%
delete_graph_project Destructive 65 0.8%
delete_project Destructive 58 0.8%
get_project_usage Read 53 0.7%
deploy_production Execute 51 0.7%
get_project Read 47 0.6%
list_projects Read 36 0.5%
get_subscription_status Read 34 0.4%
get_user_info Read 31 0.4%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 44.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (174 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 44 tools (no gateway) 7,671 tokens
3 granted tools ~523 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~872 tokens −89%
10 granted tools ~1,743 tokens −77%

RationalBloks token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the RationalBloks MCP server use?+

Its 44 tool definitions total 7,671 tokens — 3.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does RationalBloks consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce RationalBloks's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes RationalBloks to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 523 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 44 catalogued RationalBloks tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes RationalBloks to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.