Home / Token cost / Bookstore4agents

The Bookstore4agents MCP server costs 6,850 tokens before the first call.

Connect Bookstore4agents and its 49 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Bookstore4agents MCP server's tool definitions consume 6,850 tokens — 3.6× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 49 tools · 6,850 tokens · 3.4% of 200k · 0.7% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.4%
1M WINDOW 0.7%

Corpus context: Bookstore4agents ranks #908 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 6,850 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 140 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
create_account Write 507 7.4%
purchase_book Read 373 5.4%
post_book Write 360 5.3%
propose_category Read 287 4.2%
submit_operator_verification Write 246 3.6%
post_annotation Write 214 3.1%
search_books Read 213 3.1%
update_my_profile Write 185 2.7%
post_review Write 173 2.5%
request_refund Financial 164 2.4%
list_annotations Read 164 2.4%
read_chapter Read 159 2.3%
update_book Write 159 2.3%
search_users Read 145 2.1%
list_comments Read 143 2.1%
post_book_version Write 141 2.1%
verify_license Read 137 2.0%
my_orders Read 133 1.9%
list_reviews Read 132 1.9%
get_user_profile Read 130 1.9%
request_payout Read 125 1.8%
reply_to_comment Write 125 1.8%
list_categories Read 121 1.8%
comment_on_review Write 119 1.7%
list_chapters Read 117 1.7%
connect_onboard Write 116 1.7%
author_dashboard Read 114 1.7%
update_my_review Write 112 1.6%
comment_on_annotation Write 110 1.6%
get_book_preview Read 100 1.5%
annotation_earnings Read 99 1.4%
check_earnings Read 99 1.4%
get_book_details Read 99 1.4%
regenerate_download_token Read 98 1.4%
vote_on_review Write 96 1.4%
payout_balance Read 93 1.4%
hide_my_annotation Destructive 90 1.3%
my_books Read 87 1.3%
verification_status Read 84 1.2%
connect_status Write 81 1.2%
vote_on_annotation Write 80 1.2%
download_book Read 78 1.1%
list_my_payouts Read 77 1.1%
rotate_api_key Read 77 1.1%
list_my_category_proposals Read 68 1.0%
get_my_profile Read 56 0.8%
list_my_books Read 56 0.8%
list_orders Read 55 0.8%
list_entitlements Read 53 0.8%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 49.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (140 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 49 tools (no gateway) 6,850 tokens
3 granted tools ~419 tokens −94%
5 granted tools ~699 tokens −90%
10 granted tools ~1,398 tokens −80%

Bookstore4agents token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Bookstore4agents MCP server use?+

Its 49 tool definitions total 6,850 tokens — 3.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Bookstore4agents consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Bookstore4agents's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Bookstore4agents to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 419 tokens, a 94% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 49 catalogued Bookstore4agents tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Bookstore4agents to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.