Home / Token cost / Syenite

The Syenite MCP server costs 14,183 tokens before the first call.

Connect Syenite and its 46 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 7.1% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Syenite MCP server's tool definitions consume 14,183 tokens — 7.4× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 46 tools · 14,183 tokens · 7.1% of 200k · 1.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 7.1%
1M WINDOW 1.4%

Corpus context: Syenite ranks #102 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 14,183 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 308 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
alerts.watch Destructive 854 6.0%
swap.quote Execute 553 3.9%
rates.watch Read 553 3.9%
prediction.watch Destructive 490 3.5%
yield.opportunities Execute 483 3.4%
tx.guard Write 481 3.4%
lending.risk.assess Execute 435 3.1%
prediction.order Read 426 3.0%
swap.multi Read 420 3.0%
find.strategy Execute 405 2.9%
lending.supply Read 385 2.7%
strategy.carry.screen Execute 384 2.7%
lending.rates.query Read 383 2.7%
prediction.quote Read 357 2.5%
tx.simulate Read 323 2.3%
yield.assess Execute 322 2.3%
prediction.signals Read 320 2.3%
metamorpho.supply Read 316 2.2%
lending.position.monitor Destructive 312 2.2%
kalshi.signals Read 305 2.2%
gas.estimate Read 304 2.1%
lending.borrow Read 293 2.1%
lending.repay Read 291 2.1%
tx.verify Read 291 2.1%
token.price Execute 266 1.9%
lending.withdraw Read 265 1.9%
metamorpho.withdraw Read 265 1.9%
prediction.compare Read 263 1.9%
lending.market.overview Execute 259 1.8%
wallet.balances Read 252 1.8%
tx.receipt Write 240 1.7%
prediction.arbitrage Read 232 1.6%
prediction.market Destructive 224 1.6%
swap.status Destructive 220 1.6%
kalshi.search Read 198 1.4%
prediction.search Read 197 1.4%
kalshi.market Read 195 1.4%
kalshi.book Read 191 1.3%
kalshi.trending Read 190 1.3%
prediction.trending Read 189 1.3%
alerts.check Destructive 182 1.3%
prediction.position Destructive 177 1.2%
prediction.book Write 174 1.2%
alerts.remove Destructive 125 0.9%
syenite.help Read 102 0.7%
alerts.list Destructive 91 0.6%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 46.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (308 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 46 tools (no gateway) 14,183 tokens
3 granted tools ~925 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~1,542 tokens −89%
10 granted tools ~3,083 tokens −78%

Syenite token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Syenite MCP server use?+

Its 46 tool definitions total 14,183 tokens — 7.1% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Syenite consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Syenite's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Syenite to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 925 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 46 catalogued Syenite tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Syenite to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.