Home / Token cost / CourtListener

The CourtListener MCP server costs 3,299 tokens before the first call.

Connect CourtListener and its 19 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.6% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The CourtListener MCP server's tool definitions consume 3,299 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 19 tools · 3,299 tokens · 1.6% of 200k · 0.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.6%
1M WINDOW 0.3%

Corpus context: CourtListener ranks #1255 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 3,299 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 174 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
search_recap_documents Read 287 8.7%
search_opinions Read 286 8.7%
search_dockets_with_documents Read 272 8.2%
search_dockets Read 251 7.6%
citation_parse_citation_with_citeurl Execute 250 7.6%
citation_enhanced_citation_lookup Read 250 7.6%
citation_lookup_citation Read 248 7.5%
citation_verify_citation_format Read 228 6.9%
search_audio Read 221 6.7%
search_people Read 221 6.7%
citation_batch_lookup_citations Read 200 6.1%
citation_extract_citations_from_text Read 181 5.5%
get_court Read 66 2.0%
get_person Read 59 1.8%
get_docket Read 58 1.8%
get_opinion Read 58 1.8%
get_audio Read 56 1.7%
get_cluster Read 55 1.7%
status Read 52 1.6%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 19.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (174 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 19 tools (no gateway) 3,299 tokens
3 granted tools ~521 tokens −84%
5 granted tools ~868 tokens −74%
10 granted tools ~1,736 tokens −47%

CourtListener token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the CourtListener MCP server use?+

Its 19 tool definitions total 3,299 tokens — 1.6% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does CourtListener consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce CourtListener's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes CourtListener to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 521 tokens, a 84% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 19 catalogued CourtListener tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes CourtListener to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.