Home / Token cost / HiveLearn

The HiveLearn MCP server costs 10,745 tokens before the first call.

Connect HiveLearn and its 43 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 5.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The HiveLearn MCP server's tool definitions consume 10,745 tokens — 5.6× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 43 tools · 10,745 tokens · 5.4% of 200k · 1.1% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 5.4%
1M WINDOW 1.1%

Corpus context: HiveLearn ranks #161 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 10,745 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 250 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
hivelearn_create_lesson Write 511 4.8%
hivelearn_update_lesson Write 473 4.4%
hivelearn_update_course Write 377 3.5%
hivelearn_create_course_outline Write 372 3.5%
hivelearn_create_certificate Write 363 3.4%
hivelearn_create_quiz_question Write 356 3.3%
hivelearn_update_event Write 354 3.3%
hivelearn_get_course_progress Read 347 3.2%
hivelearn_list_enrollments Read 341 3.2%
hivelearn_get_course_gradebook Read 339 3.2%
hivelearn_list_certificates Read 334 3.1%
hivelearn_update_lesson_content Write 328 3.1%
hivelearn_list_quizzes Read 326 3.0%
hivelearn_reorder_module_lessons Write 308 2.9%
hivelearn_create_quiz Write 297 2.8%
hivelearn_create_enrollment Write 287 2.7%
hivelearn_update_quiz_question Write 287 2.7%
hivelearn_create_event Write 284 2.6%
hivelearn_list_course_lessons Read 282 2.6%
hivelearn_update_quiz Write 278 2.6%
hivelearn_create_course Write 260 2.4%
hivelearn_update_post Write 239 2.2%
hivelearn_create_module Write 202 1.9%
hivelearn_update_module Write 196 1.8%
hivelearn_get_course_structure Read 188 1.7%
hivelearn_update_certificate Write 185 1.7%
hivelearn_publish_course Write 183 1.7%
hivelearn_get_member Read 179 1.7%
hivelearn_get_quiz Read 177 1.6%
hivelearn_list_course_modules Read 177 1.6%
hivelearn_get_course Read 174 1.6%
hivelearn_list_quiz_questions Read 172 1.6%
hivelearn_create_post Write 170 1.6%
hivelearn_get_post Read 167 1.6%
hivelearn_get_certificate Read 160 1.5%
hivelearn_get_event Read 159 1.5%
hivelearn_get_enrollment Read 156 1.5%
hivelearn_list_members Read 153 1.4%
hivelearn_list_events Read 148 1.4%
hivelearn_list_courses Read 146 1.4%
hivelearn_list_posts Read 140 1.3%
hivelearn_verify_certificate Read 91 0.8%
hivelearn_get_community_me Read 79 0.7%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 43.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (250 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 43 tools (no gateway) 10,745 tokens
3 granted tools ~750 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~1,249 tokens −88%
10 granted tools ~2,499 tokens −77%

HiveLearn token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the HiveLearn MCP server use?+

Its 43 tool definitions total 10,745 tokens — 5.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does HiveLearn consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce HiveLearn's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes HiveLearn to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 750 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 43 catalogued HiveLearn tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes HiveLearn to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.