Home / Token cost / Satoshidata Wallet Intel

The Satoshidata Wallet Intel MCP server costs 3,523 tokens before the first call.

Connect Satoshidata Wallet Intel and its 39 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.8% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Satoshidata Wallet Intel MCP server's tool definitions consume 3,523 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 39 tools · 3,523 tokens · 1.8% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.8%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Satoshidata Wallet Intel ranks #1225 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 3,523 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 90 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
submit_feedback Write 378 10.7%
mining_pool_info Read 174 4.9%
chain_awakenings Read 171 4.9%
whale_alerts Read 167 4.7%
wallet_flow_graph Read 161 4.6%
entity_list Read 123 3.5%
pulse_dormant Read 122 3.5%
dormancy_flushes Read 117 3.3%
pulse_consolidations Read 115 3.3%
tx_verify Read 115 3.3%
mempool_stress Write 111 3.2%
entity_lookup Read 108 3.1%
pulse_whales Read 98 2.8%
entity_recent_activity Read 96 2.7%
batch_trust_safety Read 91 2.6%
network_intelligence Write 83 2.4%
batch_risk_signals Read 81 2.3%
address_risk Read 78 2.2%
batch_summary Read 77 2.2%
wallet_trust_safety Destructive 73 2.1%
block_detail Read 65 1.8%
tx_status Read 61 1.7%
mempool_tx Read 59 1.7%
op_return_decode Read 59 1.7%
timestamp_hash Read 59 1.7%
pool_detail Read 57 1.6%
verify_timestamp Read 57 1.6%
wallet_contributors Read 57 1.6%
tx_broadcast Read 55 1.6%
wallet_detail Read 55 1.6%
wallet_summary Read 55 1.6%
timestamp_quote Read 48 1.4%
mempool_stats Read 45 1.3%
bitcoin_price Read 43 1.2%
pool_list Read 43 1.2%
pulse_summary Read 43 1.2%
onchain_stats Read 42 1.2%
entity_categories Read 41 1.2%
fees_recommended Read 40 1.1%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 39.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (90 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 39 tools (no gateway) 3,523 tokens
3 granted tools ~271 tokens −92%
5 granted tools ~452 tokens −87%
10 granted tools ~903 tokens −74%

Satoshidata Wallet Intel token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Satoshidata Wallet Intel MCP server use?+

Its 39 tool definitions total 3,523 tokens — 1.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Satoshidata Wallet Intel consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Satoshidata Wallet Intel's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Satoshidata Wallet Intel to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 271 tokens, a 92% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 39 catalogued Satoshidata Wallet Intel tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Satoshidata Wallet Intel to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.