Home / Token cost / Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce

The Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce MCP server costs 5,422 tokens before the first call.

Connect Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce and its 46 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.7% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce MCP server's tool definitions consume 5,422 tokens — 2.8× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 46 tools · 5,422 tokens · 2.7% of 200k · 0.5% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.7%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce ranks #998 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 5,422 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 118 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
marketplace_post_listing Write 280 5.2%
broadcast_intent Execute 276 5.1%
create_escrow Write 257 4.7%
create_workflow Write 228 4.2%
zk_commit_proof Write 201 3.7%
gateway_translate Read 200 3.7%
raise_dispute Read 186 3.4%
start_negotiation Execute 181 3.3%
subscribe_events Write 175 3.2%
predict_escrow Read 173 3.2%
post_job Write 166 3.1%
list_service Read 162 3.0%
compare_agents Read 148 2.7%
submit_evidence Write 146 2.7%
send_message Write 134 2.5%
resolve_agent Write 121 2.2%
agent_rank_lookup Read 120 2.2%
marketplace_search Read 118 2.2%
submit_proof Write 117 2.2%
register_api_key Write 116 2.1%
federated_reputation Read 113 2.1%
search_agents Read 113 2.1%
register_agent Write 110 2.0%
semantic_search Read 102 1.9%
lookup_trust_score Read 101 1.9%
register_referral Write 94 1.7%
zk_verify_proof Read 91 1.7%
estimate_fees Read 82 1.5%
get_wallet_balance Read 82 1.5%
get_referral_earnings Read 81 1.5%
browse_intents Read 80 1.5%
counter_offer Read 80 1.5%
get_identity Read 80 1.5%
get_inbox Read 80 1.5%
get_crypto_health Read 67 1.2%
deposit_wallet Financial 65 1.2%
get_escrow Read 60 1.1%
start_work Execute 59 1.1%
fund_escrow Read 59 1.1%
release_escrow Read 59 1.1%
get_workflow Read 53 1.0%
marketplace_get_listing Read 49 0.9%
get_dispute Read 47 0.9%
get_platform_info Read 45 0.8%
marketplace_categories Execute 36 0.7%
create_wallet Write 29 0.5%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 46.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (118 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 46 tools (no gateway) 5,422 tokens
3 granted tools ~354 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~589 tokens −89%
10 granted tools ~1,179 tokens −78%

Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce MCP server use?+

Its 46 tool definitions total 5,422 tokens — 2.7% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 354 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 46 catalogued Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Synmerco — Confidential Escrow for AI Agent Commerce to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.