Home / Token cost / Loaditout

The Loaditout MCP server costs 4,027 tokens before the first call.

Connect Loaditout and its 21 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Loaditout MCP server's tool definitions consume 4,027 tokens — 2.1× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 21 tools · 4,027 tokens · 2.0% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.0%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Loaditout ranks #1144 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 4,027 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 192 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
search_skills Read 334 8.3%
check_capability_gap Read 308 7.6%
report_skill_usage Destructive 283 7.0%
install_skill Write 257 6.4%
validate_action Read 255 6.3%
recommend_skills Read 251 6.2%
smart_search Read 203 5.0%
flag_skill Read 200 5.0%
get_skill Read 194 4.8%
install_pack Write 192 4.8%
review_skill Write 179 4.4%
save_memory Write 175 4.3%
verify_proof Read 171 4.2%
install_batch Write 166 4.1%
set_profile Write 160 4.0%
request_permission Read 156 3.9%
list_categories Read 119 3.0%
recall_memory Execute 118 2.9%
list_my_proofs Read 109 2.7%
share_loadout Read 99 2.5%
check_permission Read 98 2.4%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 21.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (192 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 21 tools (no gateway) 4,027 tokens
3 granted tools ~575 tokens −86%
5 granted tools ~959 tokens −76%
10 granted tools ~1,918 tokens −52%

Loaditout token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Loaditout MCP server use?+

Its 21 tool definitions total 4,027 tokens — 2.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Loaditout consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Loaditout's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Loaditout to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 575 tokens, a 86% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 21 catalogued Loaditout tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Loaditout to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.