Home / Token cost / Nansen-MCP

The Nansen- MCP server costs 12,599 tokens before the first call.

Connect Nansen- and its 24 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 6.3% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Nansen-MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 12,599 tokens — 6.6× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 24 tools · 12,599 tokens · 6.3% of 200k · 1.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 6.3%
1M WINDOW 1.3%

Corpus context: Nansen- ranks #122 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 12,599 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 525 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
token_discovery_screener Destructive 1,915 15.2%
token_current_top_holders Write 1,340 10.6%
token_pnl_leaderboard Write 1,171 9.3%
token_transfers Read 1,126 8.9%
token_dex_trades Write 878 7.0%
general_search Read 809 6.4%
token_ohlcv Execute 710 5.6%
address_portfolio Read 527 4.2%
token_flows Write 518 4.1%
nansen_score_top_tokens Read 499 4.0%
smart_traders_and_funds_perp_trades Write 429 3.4%
address_counterparties Read 397 3.2%
token_quant_scores Execute 389 3.1%
token_recent_flows_summary Read 371 2.9%
hyperliquid_leaderboard Read 321 2.5%
token_who_bought_sold Read 318 2.5%
address_related_addresses Read 261 2.1%
wallet_pnl_summary Read 128 1.0%
smart_traders_and_funds_token_balances Read 116 0.9%
wallet_pnl_for_token Read 92 0.7%
growth_chain_rank Read 82 0.7%
address_transactions Read 76 0.6%
transaction_lookup Read 66 0.5%
address_historical_balances Read 60 0.5%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 24.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (525 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 24 tools (no gateway) 12,599 tokens
3 granted tools ~1,575 tokens −88%
5 granted tools ~2,625 tokens −79%
10 granted tools ~5,250 tokens −58%

Nansen-MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Nansen- MCP server use?+

Its 24 tool definitions total 12,599 tokens — 6.3% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Nansen-MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Nansen-MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Nansen-MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 1,575 tokens, a 88% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 24 catalogued Nansen-MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Nansen-MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.