Home / Token cost / Resonance Reward Agent

The Resonance Reward Agent MCP server costs 5,369 tokens before the first call.

Connect Resonance Reward Agent and its 45 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.7% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Resonance Reward Agent MCP server's tool definitions consume 5,369 tokens — 2.8× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 45 tools · 5,369 tokens · 2.7% of 200k · 0.5% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.7%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: Resonance Reward Agent ranks #1002 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 5,369 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 119 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
rsnc_agent_create_event Write 252 4.7%
rsnc_agent_create_perk Write 242 4.5%
rsnc_agent_best_deals Read 235 4.4%
rsnc_agent_route_purchase Read 182 3.4%
rsnc_agent_onboard_brand Read 180 3.4%
rsnc_agent_leaderboard Read 167 3.1%
rsnc_agent_compare_cashback Read 166 3.1%
rsnc_agent_update_event Write 163 3.0%
rsnc_agent_process_bulk Read 160 3.0%
rsnc_agent_browse_perks Read 156 2.9%
rsnc_agent_next_goal Read 151 2.8%
rsnc_agent_process_event Read 151 2.8%
rsnc_agent_update_perk Write 150 2.8%
rsnc_agent_compare_brands Read 144 2.7%
rsnc_agent_stack_deals Read 133 2.5%
rsnc_agent_redeem_perk Read 130 2.4%
rsnc_agent_estimate_roi Read 128 2.4%
rsnc_agent_list_brands Read 125 2.3%
rsnc_agent_claim_reward Read 114 2.1%
rsnc_agent_request_info Read 113 2.1%
rsnc_agent_brand_analytics Read 110 2.0%
rsnc_agent_brand_rankings Read 110 2.0%
rsnc_agent_user_stats Read 109 2.0%
rsnc_agent_network_trending Read 105 2.0%
rsnc_agent_event_performance Execute 103 1.9%
rsnc_agent_user_balance Read 101 1.9%
rsnc_agent_brand_perks Read 99 1.8%
rsnc_agent_network_flows Read 99 1.8%
rsnc_agent_manage_keys Write 95 1.8%
rsnc_agent_brand_info Read 90 1.7%
rsnc_agent_check_brand Read 89 1.7%
rsnc_agent_user_portfolio Read 89 1.7%
rsnc_agent_user_recommendations Read 89 1.7%
rsnc_agent_network_analytics Read 85 1.6%
rsnc_agent_perk_audience Read 83 1.5%
rsnc_agent_suggest_events Read 79 1.5%
rsnc_agent_user_persona Read 78 1.5%
rsnc_agent_suggest_perks Read 72 1.3%
rsnc_agent_brand_health Read 71 1.3%
rsnc_agent_perk_intelligence Read 70 1.3%
rsnc_agent_brand_audience Read 67 1.2%
rsnc_agent_perk_analytics Read 67 1.2%
rsnc_agent_my_rewards Read 63 1.2%
rsnc_agent_network_info Read 54 1.0%
rsnc_agent_network_stats Read 50 0.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 45.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (119 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 45 tools (no gateway) 5,369 tokens
3 granted tools ~358 tokens −93%
5 granted tools ~597 tokens −89%
10 granted tools ~1,193 tokens −78%

Resonance Reward Agent token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Resonance Reward Agent MCP server use?+

Its 45 tool definitions total 5,369 tokens — 2.7% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Resonance Reward Agent consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Resonance Reward Agent's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Resonance Reward Agent to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 358 tokens, a 93% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 45 catalogued Resonance Reward Agent tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Resonance Reward Agent to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.