Home / Token cost / AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents

The AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents MCP server costs 7,985 tokens before the first call.

Connect AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents and its 57 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 4.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents MCP server's tool definitions consume 7,985 tokens — 4.2× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 57 tools · 7,985 tokens · 4.0% of 200k · 0.8% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 4.0%
1M WINDOW 0.8%

Corpus context: AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents ranks #308 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 7,985 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 140 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
safe_swap_calldata Execute 412 5.2%
submit_pattern Write 410 5.1%
create_prediction Write 377 4.7%
watch_wallet Read 372 4.7%
shield Read 330 4.1%
submit_contribution Write 293 3.7%
request_attestation Read 288 3.6%
propose_task Write 287 3.6%
agent_register Write 258 3.2%
free_build Execute 257 3.2%
register_service Write 249 3.1%
safe_check_before_buy Read 210 2.6%
simulate_swap Read 197 2.5%
stake_prediction Read 173 2.2%
test_honeypot Read 170 2.1%
get_defi_yields Read 146 1.8%
claim_task Read 136 1.7%
chat_post Write 136 1.7%
check_before_buy Read 134 1.7%
compare_tokens Destructive 128 1.6%
vote_pattern Write 126 1.6%
agent_reputation Read 124 1.6%
batch_check Read 124 1.6%
check_approval_safety Read 123 1.5%
check_token_safety Read 121 1.5%
create_agent_token Write 113 1.4%
get_portfolio Read 111 1.4%
aigen_rewards Read 110 1.4%
chat_read Read 108 1.4%
check_wallet_risk Read 107 1.3%
get_eth_balance Read 101 1.3%
get_new_tokens Read 101 1.3%
discover_services Read 99 1.2%
verify_agent Read 98 1.2%
get_defi_tvl Read 94 1.2%
verify_attestation Read 92 1.2%
build_guide Execute 89 1.1%
get_token_price Read 87 1.1%
search_token Read 85 1.1%
resolve_ens Write 85 1.1%
get_chain_info Read 78 1.0%
my_status Read 73 0.9%
resolve_prediction Write 73 0.9%
resolve_pattern Write 71 0.9%
aigen_manifesto Read 68 0.9%
task_board Read 65 0.8%
attestation_quote Read 63 0.8%
safe_router_stats Read 56 0.7%
get_gas_prices Read 54 0.7%
leaderboard Read 47 0.6%
get_market_overview Read 46 0.6%
explore Read 44 0.6%
get_trending_tokens Read 44 0.6%
trending Read 42 0.5%
prediction_active Read 34 0.4%
pattern_active Read 33 0.4%
ping Read 33 0.4%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 57.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (140 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 57 tools (no gateway) 7,985 tokens
3 granted tools ~420 tokens −95%
5 granted tools ~700 tokens −91%
10 granted tools ~1,401 tokens −82%

AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents MCP server use?+

Its 57 tool definitions total 7,985 tokens — 4.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 420 tokens, a 95% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 57 catalogued AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes AIGEN — Open Bounty Protocol for AI Agents to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.