Home / Token cost / Menjometre

The Menjometre MCP server costs 3,905 tokens before the first call.

Connect Menjometre and its 48 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 2.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Menjometre MCP server's tool definitions consume 3,905 tokens — 2.0× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 48 tools · 3,905 tokens · 2.0% of 200k · 0.4% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.0%
1M WINDOW 0.4%

Corpus context: Menjometre ranks #1167 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 3,905 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 81 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
get_rankings Read 195 5.0%
get_entity_grants Read 159 4.1%
get_lobby_meetings Read 156 4.0%
get_entity_contracts Read 154 3.9%
list_organs Read 126 3.2%
get_source_documents Read 118 3.0%
get_porta_giratoria Read 114 2.9%
find_shortest_path Read 112 2.9%
search Read 112 2.9%
get_fiscal_deficit Read 109 2.8%
detect_undisclosed_conflicts Read 106 2.7%
get_yearly_trends Read 101 2.6%
analyze_conflict_of_interest Read 100 2.6%
get_network_hubs Read 100 2.6%
list_carrecs Read 100 2.6%
get_budget_by_department Read 95 2.4%
get_yearly_trends_budget Read 94 2.4%
list_ens_publics Read 93 2.4%
export_data Write 92 2.4%
detect_clusters Read 89 2.3%
get_person_network Read 84 2.2%
fetch_source_document Read 77 2.0%
get_entity Read 72 1.8%
get_entity_risk_analysis Read 69 1.8%
get_budget_transfers Read 68 1.7%
get_entity_network Read 68 1.7%
compare_entities Read 67 1.7%
list_documents_for_entity Read 65 1.7%
get_organ Read 62 1.6%
get_ens_public Read 58 1.5%
get_pressupostos_hub Read 58 1.5%
get_entity_conflicts Read 57 1.5%
get_entity_financials Read 57 1.5%
get_politician_salary_history Read 57 1.5%
analyze_contract_network Read 56 1.4%
list_filter_options Read 56 1.4%
get_budget_partides Read 55 1.4%
get_efficiency_analysis Read 54 1.4%
get_politician Read 54 1.4%
get_equivalencies Read 50 1.3%
get_party Read 47 1.2%
get_politician_conflicts Read 46 1.2%
investigate_cluster Read 44 1.1%
get_politica_hub Read 42 1.1%
get_dataset_stats Read 41 1.0%
get_methodology Read 41 1.0%
get_xarxa_stats Read 38 1.0%
get_xarxa_by_comarca Read 37 0.9%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 48.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (81 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 48 tools (no gateway) 3,905 tokens
3 granted tools ~244 tokens −94%
5 granted tools ~407 tokens −90%
10 granted tools ~814 tokens −79%

Menjometre token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Menjometre MCP server use?+

Its 48 tool definitions total 3,905 tokens — 2.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Menjometre consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Menjometre's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Menjometre to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 244 tokens, a 94% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 48 catalogued Menjometre tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Menjometre to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.