Home / Token cost / TextForge

The TextForge MCP server costs 2,730 tokens before the first call.

Connect TextForge and its 22 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.4% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The TextForge MCP server's tool definitions consume 2,730 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 22 tools · 2,730 tokens · 1.4% of 200k · 0.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.4%
1M WINDOW 0.3%

Corpus context: TextForge ranks #1349 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 2,730 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 124 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
create_draft Write 340 12.5%
update_draft Write 268 9.8%
list_drafts Read 176 6.4%
get_thread Read 163 6.0%
get_thread_by_external_id Read 155 5.7%
list_threads Read 150 5.5%
search_threads_by_contact Read 147 5.4%
get_draft_attachment_upload_url Read 143 5.2%
search_messages Read 139 5.1%
get_attachment_download_url Read 137 5.0%
list_engaged_threads Read 104 3.8%
import_thread Write 99 3.6%
reject_draft Write 92 3.4%
delete_draft Destructive 85 3.1%
remove_draft_attachment Destructive 75 2.7%
sync_inbox Execute 72 2.6%
list_message_attachments Read 70 2.6%
sync_thread Read 70 2.6%
list_draft_attachments Read 66 2.4%
submit_draft Write 66 2.4%
get_draft_activity Read 58 2.1%
get_draft Read 55 2.0%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 22.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (124 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 22 tools (no gateway) 2,730 tokens
3 granted tools ~372 tokens −86%
5 granted tools ~620 tokens −77%
10 granted tools ~1,241 tokens −55%

TextForge token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the TextForge MCP server use?+

Its 22 tool definitions total 2,730 tokens — 1.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does TextForge consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce TextForge's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes TextForge to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 372 tokens, a 86% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 22 catalogued TextForge tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes TextForge to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.