Home / Token cost / Crinkl Commerce MCP

The Crinkl Commerce MCP server costs 2,931 tokens before the first call.

Connect Crinkl Commerce and its 22 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 1.5% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Crinkl Commerce MCP MCP server's tool definitions consume 2,931 tokens — around the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 22 tools · 2,931 tokens · 1.5% of 200k · 0.3% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 1.5%
1M WINDOW 0.3%

Corpus context: Crinkl Commerce ranks #1314 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 2,931 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 133 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
verify-issued-gmv Read 292 10.0%
submit-receipt Write 197 6.7%
get-recent-issued-proofs Read 183 6.2%
get-cumulative-gmv Read 165 5.6%
resolve-cbsa Write 165 5.6%
verify-receipt Read 164 5.6%
get-spend-signals Read 148 5.0%
get-gmv-inclusion-proof Read 136 4.6%
claim-api-key Read 135 4.6%
get-reward-policy Read 131 4.5%
verify-reward-commitment Read 123 4.2%
pair-agent Execute 116 4.0%
get-daily-gmv Read 116 4.0%
get-agent-me Read 115 3.9%
get-spend-distribution Read 110 3.8%
get-trailing-gmv Read 105 3.6%
get-settlement-summary Read 102 3.5%
get-issuer-keys Read 97 3.3%
get-agent-capabilities Read 92 3.1%
get-merchant-summary Read 82 2.8%
get-protocol-summary Read 82 2.8%
get-vendors Read 75 2.6%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 22.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (133 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 22 tools (no gateway) 2,931 tokens
3 granted tools ~400 tokens −86%
5 granted tools ~666 tokens −77%
10 granted tools ~1,332 tokens −55%

Crinkl Commerce MCP token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Crinkl Commerce MCP server use?+

Its 22 tool definitions total 2,931 tokens — 1.5% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Crinkl Commerce MCP consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Crinkl Commerce MCP's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Crinkl Commerce MCP to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 400 tokens, a 86% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 22 catalogued Crinkl Commerce MCP tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Crinkl Commerce MCP to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.