High Risk →

ux_review

Run an AI-powered UX review on any URL. Captures a screenshot and analyzes it along with accessibility tree, SEO metadata, and performance metrics using Kimi k2.5 vision. Returns actionable UX feedback across categories: Accessibility, SEO, Performance, Navigation, Content, and Mobile-friendliness.

Accepts URL/endpoint input (url)

Part of the Screenshotsmcp MCP server. Enforce policies on this tool with Intercept, the open-source MCP proxy.

AI agents invoke ux_review to trigger processes or run actions in Screenshotsmcp. Execute operations can have side effects beyond the immediate call -- triggering builds, sending notifications, or starting workflows. Rate limits and argument validation are essential to prevent runaway execution.

ux_review can trigger processes with real-world consequences. An uncontrolled agent might start dozens of builds, send mass notifications, or kick off expensive compute jobs. Intercept enforces rate limits and validates arguments to keep execution within safe bounds.

Execute tools trigger processes. Rate-limit and validate arguments to prevent unintended side effects.

relievedattention992-smithery-screenshotsmcp.yaml
tools:
  ux_review:
    rules:
      - action: allow
        rate_limit:
          max: 10
          window: 60
        validate:
          required_args: true

See the full Screenshotsmcp policy for all 56 tools.

Tool Name ux_review
Category Execute
Risk Level High

View all 56 tools →

Agents calling execute-class tools like ux_review have been implicated in these attack patterns. Read the full case and prevention policy for each:

Browse the full MCP Attack Database →

Other tools in the Execute risk category across the catalogue. The same policy patterns (rate-limit, validate) apply to each.

ux_review is one of the high-risk operations in Screenshotsmcp. For the full severity-focused view — only the high-risk tools with their recommended policies — see the breakdown for this server, or browse all high-risk tools across every MCP server.

What does the ux_review tool do? +

Run an AI-powered UX review on any URL. Captures a screenshot and analyzes it along with accessibility tree, SEO metadata, and performance metrics using Kimi k2.5 vision. Returns actionable UX feedback across categories: Accessibility, SEO, Performance, Navigation, Content, and Mobile-friendliness.. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the Screenshotsmcp MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.

How do I enforce a policy on ux_review? +

Add a rule in your Intercept YAML policy under the tools section for ux_review. You can allow, deny, rate-limit, or validate arguments. Then run Intercept as a proxy in front of the Screenshotsmcp MCP server.

What risk level is ux_review? +

ux_review is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.

Can I rate-limit ux_review? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the ux_review rule in your Intercept policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block ux_review completely? +

Set action: deny in the Intercept policy for ux_review. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides ux_review? +

ux_review is provided by the Screenshotsmcp MCP server (relievedattention992-smithery/screenshotsmcp). Intercept sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

Enforce policies on Screenshotsmcp

Open source. One binary. Zero dependencies.

npx -y @policylayer/intercept
github.com/policylayer/intercept →
// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.