Home / Token cost / Todoist Integration Server

The Todoist Integration Server MCP server costs 5,930 tokens before the first call.

Connect Todoist Integration Server and its 39 tool definitions are loaded into the model's context on every request — 3.0% of a 200k window spent before your agent does anything.

QUICK ANSWER The Todoist Integration Server MCP server's tool definitions consume 5,930 tokens — 3.1× the median MCP server (1,905 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS 39 tools · 5,930 tokens · 3.0% of 200k · 0.6% of 1M Method →

What that buys before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 3.0%
1M WINDOW 0.6%

Corpus context: Todoist Integration Server ranks #968 of 3,213 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,905 tokens, p90 is 7,952, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 5,930 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 152 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
get-tasks-by-filter Read 2,948 49.7%
add-task Write 333 5.6%
update-task Write 321 5.4%
get-tasks-completed-by-due-date Read 210 3.5%
get-tasks-completed-by-completion-date Read 205 3.5%
add-project Write 134 2.3%
add-comment Write 131 2.2%
update-project Write 125 2.1%
quick-add-task Write 119 2.0%
update-label Write 115 1.9%
add-label Write 110 1.9%
move-tasks Write 107 1.8%
get-comments Read 92 1.6%
get-productivity-stats Read 74 1.2%
update-comment Write 58 1.0%
add-section Write 49 0.8%
rename-shared-label Write 42 0.7%
get-project-collaborators Read 39 0.7%
get-shared-labels Read 39 0.7%
reopen-task Read 39 0.7%
update-section Write 39 0.7%
get-comment Read 37 0.6%
get-sections Read 36 0.6%
get-task Read 36 0.6%
delete-comment Destructive 35 0.6%
delete-section Destructive 35 0.6%
delete-task Destructive 35 0.6%
get-project-comments Read 35 0.6%
get-task-comments Read 35 0.6%
close-task Write 35 0.6%
remove-shared-label Destructive 33 0.6%
get-tasks Read 33 0.6%
delete-label Destructive 32 0.5%
delete-project Destructive 32 0.5%
get-label Read 32 0.5%
get-project Read 32 0.5%
get-section Read 32 0.5%
get-labels Read 28 0.5%
get-projects Read 28 0.5%

Most agents use a handful of these tools. They pay for all 39.

A PolicyLayer grant exposes only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. Estimates below assume typical-weight tools (152 tokens each).

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 39 tools (no gateway) 5,930 tokens
3 granted tools ~456 tokens −92%
5 granted tools ~760 tokens −87%
10 granted tools ~1,521 tokens −74%

Todoist Integration Server token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Todoist Integration Server MCP server use?+

Its 39 tool definitions total 5,930 tokens — 3.0% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Todoist Integration Server consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Todoist Integration Server's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Todoist Integration Server to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 456 tokens, a 92% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 07-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 39 catalogued Todoist Integration Server tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Todoist Integration Server to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.