[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only, no persistence] Parse a single raw SIP message (request OR response) and return a structured view: start line (method/status), every header in order with line numbers, body, duplicate-header counts, and a list of structural flags the parser noticed ...
Part of the SIPFlow server.
Free to start. No card required.
AI agents invoke parse_sip_message to trigger processes or run actions in SIPFlow. Execute operations can have side effects beyond the immediate call -- triggering builds, sending notifications, or starting workflows. Rate limits and argument validation are essential to prevent runaway execution.
parse_sip_message can trigger processes with real-world consequences. An uncontrolled agent might start dozens of builds, send mass notifications, or kick off expensive compute jobs. PolicyLayer enforces rate limits and validates arguments to keep execution within safe bounds.
Execute tools trigger processes. Rate-limit and validate arguments to prevent unintended side effects.
{
"version": "1",
"default": "deny",
"tools": {
"parse_sip_message": {
"limits": [
{
"counter": "parse_sip_message_rate",
"window": "minute",
"max": 10,
"scope": "grant"
}
]
}
}
} See the full SIPFlow policy for all 21 tools.
These attack patterns abuse exactly the kind of access parse_sip_message gives an agent. Each links to the full case and the policy that stops it:
Other execute tools across the catalogue. The same approach applies to each: rate-limit and validate the arguments.
[cost: free (pure CPU, no network) | read-only, no persistence] Parse a single raw SIP message (request OR response) and return a structured view: start line (method/status), every header in order with line numbers, body, duplicate-header counts, and a list of structural flags the parser noticed (missing-crlf, tag-on-pai, tag-on-ppi, invalid-folding, duplicate-single-instance, content-length-mismatch). Use FIRST when the user pastes a single INVITE / 200 / NOTIFY and asks 'what does this look like to a parser?' or 'is this even valid?'. The output makes header-level bugs (two From: headers, ;tag= on PAI/PPI, missing CRLF between headers, broken Identity folding) obvious without an LLM having to scan visually. Pair with: lint_sip_request for the full RFC compliance suite (request only); diff_sip_messages to compare two parsed messages structurally; validate_stir_shaken_identity if the message carries an Identity header.. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the SIPFlow MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.
Register the SIPFlow MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for parse_sip_message: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches SIPFlow. Nothing to install.
parse_sip_message is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.
Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the parse_sip_message rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.
Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for parse_sip_message. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.
parse_sip_message is provided by the SIPFlow MCP server (sipflow/sipflow). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.
Deterministic rules across all 21 SIPFlow tools. Per-identity grants. Full audit log. Live in minutes. Nothing to install.
Free to start. No card required.
4,600+ MCP servers and 31,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.