New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice
Home / Token cost / Pixi Inspector

The Pixi Inspector MCP server costs 19,694 tokens before the first call.

Every request your agent makes carries every tool definition this server exposes — context your code, documents and conversation can't use, mostly for tools the agent never calls. You don't need them all in the window, and you don't have to pay for them.

QUICK ANSWER The Pixi Inspector MCP server's 63 tool definitions consume 19,694 tokens — 9.8% of a 200k context window, and 11× the median MCP server (1,862 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS tiktoken o200k_base · rank #646 of 12,722 measured servers · refreshed every build Method →

What that costs before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 9.8%
1M WINDOW 2.0%

Corpus context: Pixi Inspector ranks #646 of 12,722 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,862 tokens, p90 is 13,674, and the heaviest (Ainumbers Mcp Apps) is 442,047 — 221% of a 200k window on its own. New to this? See MCP token cost and context window in the glossary.

Where the 19,694 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 313 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
pixi.stats Execute 631 3.2%
browser.screenshot Other 468 2.4%
status Read 467 2.4%
cdp.emulate.network Destructive 445 2.3%
cdp.emulate.device Destructive 424 2.2%
cdp.network.list Execute 407 2.1%
browser.targets Read 401 2.0%
browser.eval Other 391 2.0%
cdp.performance.trace.start Destructive 389 2.0%
cdp.input.key Other 389 2.0%
cdp.emulate.cpu Destructive 379 1.9%
cdp.input.click Other 377 1.9%
cdp.network.get Other 372 1.9%
pixi.node.setProperty Read 365 1.9%
pixi.tree.export Other 363 1.8%
cdp.performance.trace.stop Write 354 1.8%
cdp.emulate.touch Destructive 353 1.8%
cdp.input.scroll Other 350 1.8%
cdp.console.list Execute 346 1.8%
cdp.console.start Destructive 344 1.7%
cdp.dom.snapshot Other 343 1.7%
cdp.network.start Destructive 339 1.7%
cdp.dom.setAttribute Other 336 1.7%
cdp.dom.setOuterHTML Other 326 1.7%
spine.changeSkeleton Other 319 1.6%
cdp.dom.query Other 315 1.6%
spine.setAnimation Other 308 1.6%
cdp.input.move Other 306 1.6%
pixi.tree.getTree Other 303 1.5%
cdp.dom.removeNode Other 301 1.5%
cdp.network.stop Destructive 293 1.5%
cdp.dom.getAttributes Other 290 1.5%
cdp.dom.getBoxModel Other 290 1.5%
browser.reload Other 289 1.5%
browser.navigate Other 288 1.5%
pixi.tree.select Other 287 1.5%
pixi.tree.highlight Destructive 283 1.4%
cdp.emulate.clear Other 283 1.4%
cdp.performance.metrics Other 278 1.4%
ext.storage.remove Other 277 1.4%
cdp.console.stop Other 275 1.4%
ext.storage.set Other 275 1.4%
pixi.app.stats Other 273 1.4%
spine.setAutoUpdate Write 271 1.4%
pixi.app.renderStats Other 268 1.4%
spine.setSkin Other 268 1.4%
pixi.app.textures Read 268 1.4%
cdp.input.type Other 261 1.3%
sprite.getInfo Other 260 1.3%
spine.getInfo Other 259 1.3%
spine.setEmpty Other 257 1.3%
spine.setToSetupPose Write 257 1.3%
pixi.tree.getNode Other 256 1.3%
pixi.node.getProperties Other 254 1.3%
spine.listSkins Other 253 1.3%
spine.listAnimations Other 252 1.3%
spine.list Read 238 1.2%
ext.storage.get Read 232 1.2%
ext.logs Destructive 222 1.1%
use_target Destructive 217 1.1%
ext.reload Other 175 0.9%
ext.info Other 167 0.8%
ext.targets Other 167 0.8%

Your agent uses a handful of these tools. It pays for all 63.

You don't need all 63 of those definitions in the window. PolicyLayer is an MCP gateway that sits in front of Pixi Inspector: only the tools you grant are exposed to the agent, the rest never load. A smaller window means a sharper agent — less noise when it picks a tool — and every request costs less:

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 63 tools (no gateway) 19,694 tokens —
3 granted tools ~938 tokens −95%
5 granted tools ~1,563 tokens −92%
10 granted tools ~3,126 tokens −84%

The risk dividend: 11 of these 63 tools are critical-risk (destructive or financial) and cost 3,688 tokens (19% of the definition load). Block them — the recommended starter policy — and you reclaim that context before tuning anything else.

  1. Create a free account and register Pixi Inspector — nothing to install.
  2. Grant only the tools you use — ungranted definitions never enter the context window.
  3. Point your MCP client (Claude, Cursor, anything) at your gateway URL.
CUT PIXI INSPECTOR TOKEN COST →

Instant setup, no code required.

Pixi Inspector token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Pixi Inspector MCP server use?+

Its 63 tool definitions total 19,694 tokens — 9.8% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Pixi Inspector consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Pixi Inspector's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Pixi Inspector to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 938 tokens, a 95% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 20-10-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 63 catalogued Pixi Inspector tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Pixi Inspector to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Instant setup, no code required.

46,500+ MCP servers and 515,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.