New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

ticket_scenario_revise

Replace an owned scenario's content, compare-and-swapping on expected_version. Revisions are append-only: validation runs already recorded keep naming the exact version and hash they were proven against, so revising never rewrites past evidence — it does mean the epic needs a fresh passing run ag...

SERVERMeta Council SOURCEhttps://meta-council.com/mcp
High RISK CLASS
Category Execute
Parameters 77 required
Recommended Rate-limitedsee the rule below
Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/com-meta-council-decision-intelligence/ticket-scenario-revise.md

What ticket_scenario_revise does on Meta Council

AI agents invoke ticket_scenario_revise to trigger actions in Meta Council. What it does depends on the arguments the agent supplies, and its effects often reach beyond the immediate call: builds kicked off, notifications sent, workflows started.

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
name string Yes
ticket_id string Yes
then_steps array Yes Ordered clause steps; blank-only steps are rejected.
when_steps array Yes Ordered clause steps; blank-only steps are rejected.
given_steps array Yes Ordered clause steps; blank-only steps are rejected.
scenario_id string Yes
expected_version integer Yes

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

Why ticket_scenario_revise is rated High

ticket_scenario_revise triggers real processes with real consequences. An agent gone sideways doesn't fire it once. It starts dozens of builds, sends mass notifications, or burns through compute before anyone looks up.

Questions about ticket_scenario_revise

What does the ticket_scenario_revise tool do? +

Replace an owned scenario's content, compare-and-swapping on expected_version. Revisions are append-only: validation runs already recorded keep naming the exact version and hash they were proven against, so revising never rewrites past evidence — it does mean the epic needs a fresh passing run against the new version. A stale expected_version conflicts rather than overwriting a concurrent edit. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the Meta Council MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.

What parameters does ticket_scenario_revise accept? +

ticket_scenario_revise accepts 7 parameters: name, ticket_id, then_steps, when_steps, given_steps, scenario_id, expected_version. Required: name, ticket_id, then_steps, when_steps, given_steps, scenario_id, expected_version. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.

How do I enforce a policy on ticket_scenario_revise? +

Register the Meta Council MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for ticket_scenario_revise: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Meta Council. Nothing to install.

What risk level is ticket_scenario_revise? +

ticket_scenario_revise is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.

Can I rate-limit ticket_scenario_revise? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the ticket_scenario_revise rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block ticket_scenario_revise completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for ticket_scenario_revise. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides ticket_scenario_revise? +

ticket_scenario_revise is provided by the Meta Council MCP server (https://meta-council.com/mcp). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Meta Council, and thousands of servers like it.

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Meta Council's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.