New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

reconcile_stale_claims

[MAINTENANCE] 56e9b3c7 — project/version-scoped, auditable stale-claim reconciliation sweep. The bulk counterpart to claim_sprint_item's own inline autonomous reconciliation (which only ever fires reactively, on a claim attempt against one already-claimed item) — use this for a scheduler path, or...

SERVERMeridian SOURCE@meridianmcp/mcp
Critical RISK CLASS
Category Destructive
Parameters 80 required
Recommended Hiddensee the rule below
Registry record Grade D, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/io-github-ajc3xc-meridian/reconcile-stale-claims.md

What reconcile_stale_claims does on Meridian

AI agents call reconcile_stale_claims to permanently remove resources in Meridian, typically in cleanup and lifecycle workflows. It does its job in a single call, and there is no undo.

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
actor string — Recorded as who ran the sweep, for the audit trail. Omit to leave unattributed.
dry_run boolean — Default true: classify and report only, write nothing. Set false to actually reset every 'stale' verdict (release locks, return to pending, write an audit recor
version string — Optional: narrow the scan to one sprint-version bucket. Omit to scan every version in the project.
item_ids array — Optional: only classify/reset these specific in_progress item ids (still hard-scoped to project_id). Omit to scan every in_progress candidate.
max_batch integer — Cap on how many in_progress candidates are classified (and, if not dry-run, potentially reset) in this one call. Server-side hard ceiling applies regardless of
repo_root string — Self-hosted only: enables the worktree-pid and strict-completion-evidence liveness signals. Defaults to the server's own repo root when omitted.
project_id string —
project_name string — Project name — an alternative to project_id; resolved to the id internally. project_id wins if both are given.

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

Why reconcile_stale_claims is rated Critical

An AI agent that decides to call reconcile_stale_claims doesn't hesitate, doesn't double-check, and doesn't stop at one. Whatever it removes from Meridian is gone. There is no undo for destructive operations.

Questions about reconcile_stale_claims

What does the reconcile_stale_claims tool do? +

[MAINTENANCE] 56e9b3c7 — project/version-scoped, auditable stale-claim reconciliation sweep. The bulk counterpart to claim_sprint_item's own inline autonomous reconciliation (which only ever fires reactively, on a claim attempt against one already-claimed item) — use this for a scheduler path, or an explicit human/planner/executor-triggered audit across a whole board. Scans in_progress items in project_id (optionally narrowed to one version and/or an explicit item_ids allow-list — never cross-project), classifies each claim as active/stale/ambiguous via the same multi-signal check claim_sprint_item uses (session heartbeat liveness, claimed_at age vs. a 2h threshold, worktree/pid evidence — never age alone), and — ONLY when dry_run=False — resets every 'stale' verdict: atomically returns the item to pending, clears claimed_at/actor, releases the file/symbol resource locks the abandoned claim held, and writes an audit record. 'active' and 'ambiguous' verdicts are NEVER touched, dry-run or not — this never force-releases a genuinely live owner or treats an inconclusive signal as proof of abandonment. dry_run=True (the default) performs the full scan/classification and reports exactly what WOULD happen without writing anything — safe to run against any project, including live production boards, at any time. max_batch bounds how many in_progress candidates are scanned in one call (capped server-side); truncated=true on the result means more candidates exist than were scanned — page through with a follow-up call. Returns {project_id, version, dry_run, max_batch, candidates_total, scanned, truncated, active: [...], ambiguous: [...], stale: [...], reset: [...], errors: [...]} — active/ambiguous/stale hold classification verdicts, reset holds what was actually written back (only populated when dry_run=False), errors holds {item_id, error} for any one candidate whose classification or reset failed (never aborts the rest of the sweep). Persistent-state disclosure: on hosted Meridian, supplied text and project/session metadata -- including task log entries, pinned decisions, sprint items, notes, handoff/goal state, and HITL queue items -- are sent to and stored in Meridian's service, in an isolated per-tenant Postgres database (Neon); self-hosted deployments keep the same categories in the configured local SQLite/Postgres database. This data is visible in the dashboard and API, and may resurface in later project context or handoffs. Notes and pinned decisions can be deleted individually; task log entries and sprint items can be deleted via the dashboard/API (not exposed as an agent-facing tool); HITL queue items and handoff state have no per-record delete. Full removal of any of this data is available via project or account deletion, using the documented controls. Do not include secrets. It is categorised as a Destructive tool in the Meridian MCP Server, which means it can permanently delete or destroy data. Block by default and require explicit approval.

What parameters does reconcile_stale_claims accept? +

reconcile_stale_claims accepts 8 parameters: actor, dry_run, version, item_ids, max_batch, repo_root, project_id, project_name. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.

How do I enforce a policy on reconcile_stale_claims? +

Register the Meridian MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for reconcile_stale_claims: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Meridian. Nothing to install.

What risk level is reconcile_stale_claims? +

reconcile_stale_claims is a Destructive tool with critical risk. Critical-risk tools should be blocked by default and only enabled with explicit human approval.

Can I rate-limit reconcile_stale_claims? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the reconcile_stale_claims rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block reconcile_stale_claims completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for reconcile_stale_claims. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides reconcile_stale_claims? +

reconcile_stale_claims is provided by the Meridian MCP server (@meridianmcp/mcp). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Meridian, and thousands of servers like it.

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Meridian's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.