New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice
Home / Token cost / FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices

The FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices MCP server costs 732 tokens before the first call.

Every request your agent makes carries every tool definition this server exposes — context your code, documents and conversation can't use, mostly for tools the agent never calls. You don't need them all in the window, and you don't have to pay for them.

QUICK ANSWER The FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices MCP server's 4 tool definitions consume 732 tokens — 0.4% of a 200k context window, and below the median MCP server (1,879 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS tiktoken o200k_base · rank #7276 of 9,338 measured servers · refreshed every build Method →

What that costs before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 0.4%
1M WINDOW 0.1%

Corpus context: FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices ranks #7276 of 9,338 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,879 tokens, p90 is 13,073, and the heaviest (Ainumbers Mcp Apps) is 343,994 — 172% of a 200k window on its own. New to this? See MCP token cost and context window in the glossary.

Where the 732 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 183 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
missed_call_roi Read 206 28.1%
compare_answering_services Write 182 24.9%
recommend_answering_service_for_industry Execute 175 23.9%
get_answering_service_pricing Read 169 23.1%

Your agent uses a handful of these tools. It pays for all 4.

You don't need all 4 of those definitions in the window. PolicyLayer is an MCP gateway that sits in front of FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices: only the tools you grant are exposed to the agent, the rest never load. A smaller window means a sharper agent — less noise when it picks a tool — and every request costs less:

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 4 tools (no gateway) 732 tokens
3 granted tools ~549 tokens −25%
  1. Create a free account and register FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices — nothing to install.
  2. Grant only the tools you use — ungranted definitions never enter the context window.
  3. Point your MCP client (Claude, Cursor, anything) at your gateway URL.

FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices MCP server use?+

Its 4 tool definitions total 732 tokens — 0.4% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 549 tokens, a 25% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 22-09-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 4 catalogued FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes FitMyCall — Answering Service Prices to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Instant setup, no code required.

46,500+ MCP servers and 515,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.