Home / Token cost / Mssql

The Mssql MCP server costs 4,537 tokens before the first call.

Every request your agent makes carries every tool definition this server exposes — context your code, documents and conversation can't use, mostly for tools the agent never calls. You don't need them all in the window, and you don't have to pay for them.

QUICK ANSWER The Mssql MCP server's 33 tool definitions consume 4,537 tokens — 2.3% of a 200k context window, and 2.2× the median MCP server (2,069 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS tiktoken o200k_base · rank #1161 of 3,354 measured servers · refreshed every build Method →

What that costs before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 2.3%
1M WINDOW 0.5%

Corpus context: Mssql ranks #1161 of 3,354 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 2,069 tokens, p90 is 11,359, and the heaviest (SmartBear MCP) is 137,725 — 69% of a 200k window on its own. New to this? See MCP token cost and context window in the glossary.

Where the 4,537 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 137 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
search_stored_procedures_by_content Read 189 4.2%
analyze_data_distribution Read 186 4.1%
get_multiple_stored_procedure_definitions Read 176 3.9%
get_stored_procedure_definition Read 174 3.8%
get_all_stored_procedure_definitions Read 170 3.7%
sample_data Read 166 3.7%
describe_stored_procedure Read 163 3.6%
list_constraints Read 160 3.5%
describe_view Read 158 3.5%
list_functions Read 156 3.4%
analyze_index_usage Read 155 3.4%
list_indexes Read 151 3.3%
describe_table Read 142 3.1%
describe_trigger Read 141 3.1%
find_lookup_tables Read 139 3.1%
list_stored_procedures Read 139 3.1%
analyze_null_patterns Read 138 3.0%
find_missing_indexes Read 136 3.0%
analyze_table_stats Read 133 2.9%
list_views Read 133 2.9%
find_computed_columns Read 132 2.9%
list_triggers Read 130 2.9%
analyze_check_constraints Read 129 2.8%
list_default_constraints Read 128 2.8%
execute_query Execute 121 2.7%
detect_audit_columns Read 119 2.6%
list_user_defined_types Read 114 2.5%
get_relationships Read 113 2.5%
list_tables Read 110 2.4%
analyze_database_size Read 99 2.2%
list_databases Read 96 2.1%
test_connection Read 95 2.1%
list_connections Read 46 1.0%

Your agent uses a handful of these tools. It pays for all 33.

You don't need all 33 of those definitions in the window. PolicyLayer is an MCP gateway that sits in front of Mssql: only the tools you grant are exposed to the agent, the rest never load. A smaller window means a sharper agent — less noise when it picks a tool — and every request costs less:

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 33 tools (no gateway) 4,537 tokens
3 granted tools ~412 tokens −91%
5 granted tools ~687 tokens −85%
10 granted tools ~1,375 tokens −70%
  1. Create a free account and register Mssql — nothing to install.
  2. Grant only the tools you use — ungranted definitions never enter the context window.
  3. Point your MCP client (Claude, Cursor, anything) at your gateway URL.
CUT MSSQL TOKEN COST →

Instant setup, no code required.

Mssql token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the Mssql MCP server use?+

Its 33 tool definitions total 4,537 tokens — 2.3% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does Mssql consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce Mssql's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes Mssql to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 412 tokens, a 91% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 06-07-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 33 catalogued Mssql tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes Mssql to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Instant setup, no code required.

43,000+ MCP servers and 220,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.